What China’s five-year plan should really say
It is good to have New Year’s resolutions. But it is better to have the right ones. The Communist Party of China’s five-year plans used to be a chance to set rigid targets, with little thought given to sustainable reform. Now China, no longer a command economy, is at a critical transitional stage. This year, the Party has a chance to try harder.
The 12th five-year plan due on October 15 is likely to focus on uncontroversial issues like social welfare, urbanization and the environment. All worthy causes. But China is already driving hard toward them. Instead, are five suggestions for new goals that might work wonders.
1. Stop targeting GDP growth
Setting a growth target for the five years sends the wrong message. Over-achieving local governments merely use it as an excuse to beat the target at any environmental or social cost. China also beats its own GDP targets as a matter of routine, which makes them pointless. Growth of 11.1 percent from 2006 to 2010 smashed the official goal of 7.5 percent.
2. Start targeting balanced trade instead
China’s current account surplus fell 30 percent in 2009, but was still the second-largest in the world after Saudi Arabia. The surplus is expected to be 4 percent of its GDP in 2011. That causes friction with trade partners like the United States, and leaves China burdened with a pile of foreign currency that is $2.5 trillion and counting. A new target — say bringing the surplus down to 3 percent in the next five years — would make China more balanced, and might get opponents off its back.
3. Reform the yuan
Beijing needs to convince the world that it is serious about adjusting the value of its currency. The yuan has risen 2 percent against the dollar since late June, but fallen 12 percent against the euro and 6 percent against the yen. A stronger yuan would put more power in consumers’ hands, and give China a way to combat inflationary pressures.
A good step would be to promise some appreciation against a basket of currencies, rather than recent empty comments about making the yuan more reflective of supply and demand. A detailed roadmap for China’s grand plan of making the yuan an international currency would also help convince that yuan reform is more than a pipe dream.
4. Let the market decide the price of money
China’s central bank fixes the highest deposit rate at just 2.3 percent, lower than the official inflation target of 3 percent. Big corporates are subsidized by cheap loans. Banks enjoy a fat lending margin. Faithful depositors lose out.
Beijing is trying to crack down on banks which lure depositors with other incentives, when it should be allowing more competition for deposits through market rates. When the cost of money goes up, investors are likely to be more discerning of risks. That may direct money from capital intensive sectors, such as heavy industries, to labor intensive sectors like services. It couldn’t be done overnight — but it could probably be achieved over five years.
5. Reduce the role of the state
During the past seven years, the number of state-owned enterprises fell, but their assets tripled to $3 trillion, revenues quadrupled to $1.9 trillion, and profits more than tripled to $122 billion. State fiscal revenues have been outpacing growth of GDP and incomes, and the government actually topped up its investments in big banks when they raised capital this year.
To promote consumption, the state needs to share more wealth with its people. The private sector faces an uphill battle competing against powerful SOEs. Yet innovation is more likely to come from entrepreneurs than civil servants. And there are financial risks of holding big equity stakes: to participate in bank rights issues, the government leveraged up its own balance sheet.
Most of these five goals aren’t likely to appear in this five-year’s plan. Maybe they will be in the next one. But if China is serious about sustainable economic growth, putting these to the top of the agenda would be a good start.


Comments RSS
When are we going to stop lecturing others on how to improve and start concentrating on ourselves…
1.) Of course welfare and the environment aren’t controversial issues for this 5-year plan. China must provide some (any) type of welfare, and if the state of its environment continues on its current path, it’ll be uninhabitable for the world’s largest population after several decades. These are good goals that need to be pursued with 110% of the CCP’s energy.
2.) A stronger yuan would put more power in the hand of the Chinese consumer, but it would likely decrease the number of consumers since jobs would dwindle as the cost of China’s labor rises. As far as a detailed road map for the yuan’s appreciation goes, how detailed do you want them to be? The world’s economy has arguably reached it’s greatest level of volatility in history. Such a rigid approach to currency reform might be as futile as drawing a road atlas on a beach in high tide.
I’d rather the Chinese not make empty promises than pull a Geithner on the world.
3.) Certainly the Chinese government needs to share more wealth with its people, but should it do so in order to increase consumption? As the state of the world’s environment (and especially China’s) grows increasingly volatile, increased Chinese consumption is probably the most toxic form of development. Although multinationals will itch in their skin at this comment, they’re not focused too much on the “externalities” that are very real “realities.”
Privatization isn’t necessarily the answer. Sure it’s great for private investors, but it won’t lead to a greater appropriation of money across society or a more stable economy – just look at the US. Hearken back to the world financial crisis one year ago.
The five-point suggestions sound like same old same old, trying to persuade China to follow the western economic model (not really the western economic models in reality but only the idealized western model in people’s mind, as more and more western governments are leaning towards heavy government regulations nowadays). The problem is that the Chinese economy has been prodding its own way for three decades and seems to be doing okay. How do we know that the western economic model, which has yet to be proved to be more advantageous in theoretical economics, is the universally superior model?
What China really needs is a relatively transparent trustworthy judicial system at its basic, daily-life and apolitical level. Due to the fast developing economy, apolitical economic-interest disputes among Chinese erupt almost everyday, and yet China’s current top-down judicial system has lost the credibility to settle these dispute. Without the judicial system providing effective trustworthy judgments or settlements, these disputes often end with violence and clashes between crowds and police. The Chinese judicial system fails because its top-down bureaucracy cannot handle the complex problems in the local level. What China needs, urgently rather, is a local judicial system that involves local citizens in the decision-making process, sort of like the jury system in the United States.
China needs to act according to its own characteristics.Because china has huge population not like other developed countries.
Are does goals made by the White house?
Taday china combine command economy with market economy as Deng XiaoPing’s guidance.I’m not a economist and cannot make a comment about China’s five-year plan.Maybe it wiil be proved by practice sometime.
China has tons of trade surplus. China may find it difficult to focus on domestic development because the more money in domestic market may induce their local residents towards liberalisation of political system. China should solve border issues with their neighbours in an amenable manner and should assure these border sharing countries that the China will not follow its expansionary policies. Only the co-operation with upcoming and mighty neighbour countries may enhance the China being emerged as One of the World leader.
I believe that if China were rules by the US, the US Government would surely have adopted the above five-point plan.