<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Too big to fail&#8221; alive and well in U.S. banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/11/23/too-big-to-fail-alive-and-well-in-u-s-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/11/23/too-big-to-fail-alive-and-well-in-u-s-banking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: breezinthru</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/11/23/too-big-to-fail-alive-and-well-in-u-s-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-5184</link>
		<dc:creator>breezinthru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 04:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4689#comment-5184</guid>
		<description>After the last election, the details of Frank/Dodd will be hammered out under the direction of the same party that insisted removing the bank tax from the original bill.

Too big to fail will remain a problem well into the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the last election, the details of Frank/Dodd will be hammered out under the direction of the same party that insisted removing the bank tax from the original bill.</p>
<p>Too big to fail will remain a problem well into the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walstir</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2010/11/23/too-big-to-fail-alive-and-well-in-u-s-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-5180</link>
		<dc:creator>walstir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=4689#comment-5180</guid>
		<description>&#039;Too big to fail&#039; can be a significant issue where individual large incompetent and/or corrupt institutions fail and then cause a domino effect by collapsing other well run companies.  This was not the case in the current financial crisis which was the result of a systemic fallacy believed by all institutions - namely that there would never be a widespread decline in a key asset category like housing.  If there had been a larger number of smaller organizations; then &#039;too big to fail&#039; would just have become &#039;too many to fail&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Too big to fail&#8217; can be a significant issue where individual large incompetent and/or corrupt institutions fail and then cause a domino effect by collapsing other well run companies.  This was not the case in the current financial crisis which was the result of a systemic fallacy believed by all institutions &#8211; namely that there would never be a widespread decline in a key asset category like housing.  If there had been a larger number of smaller organizations; then &#8216;too big to fail&#8217; would just have become &#8216;too many to fail&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
