Extraction technology drives rash of oil deals
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
NEW YORK — It’s tempting to use pricier oil to explain Monday’s trio of oil services industry deals, headlined by General Electric’s purchase of Wellstream Holdings for 800 million pounds. But the stronger underlying theme is rising interest in techniques for reaching oil that’s hard to get at. Specialists want new capabilities — and the majors want bigger partners.
Wellstream and the day’s two other takeover targets, PSN and Easternwell, all have expertise and technology in extracting energy from tricky places. Flexible pipes of the type UK-based Wellstream makes are essential as energy giants delve deeper into the oceans for oil. PSN is a specialist in boosting production from old wells. And Australia’s Easternwell knows how to extract coal seam gas — once a nuisance that killed canaries in mines, but now a precious resource.
Demand for traditional drilling equipment remains slack despite rising oil prices because new discoveries of conventional fossil fuel deposits have been scarce. Instead, the oil services arms race has focused on how to get at difficult deposits. In addition, rather than abandoning old wells and moving on, it has become worthwhile to invest in keeping older wells alive — another technically challenging proposition. So far, only about a third of the fuel in existing wells worldwide has been harvested, according to IHS.
This, rather than $90-a-barrel oil, is the main driver behind the latest rash of deals. Even two of the biggest transactions of recent years, Schlumberger’s $11 billion takeover of Smith and Baker Hughes’ $5.5 billion purchase of BJ Services, had more to do with the two targets’ expertise in cracking previously inaccessible energy out of rock than with buoyant oil prices.
For the smaller players in oil services, there’s an M&A motivation beyond technology, too: specialists in hard-to-get oil will need to get bigger as demand for their services from Big Oil increases. Of course, a bargain basement oil price would slow consolidation. At $50 a barrel, some of the more costly exploration and recovery methods cease to make sense. But assuming no such collapse, companies in the oil services sector will keep exploring for new deals.


Comments RSS
Why explore new technology when we can stick our heads in the tar sands?
I won’t comment on such a “vertical” piece. But I do have questions.
How much more energy is now considered recoverable?
If the experts believe we have used no more than 1/3, how long until we run out?
Have any policies or conservation movements expanded the timeline?
Thanks for the comment Mr Henry. I can’t give a precise answer to your questions. The estimates I used in this article were from IHS, which is a consultancy.
How much of the remaining two thirds of hydrocarbons we can recover will partly depend on how hard we try. If you use hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling — along with a host of other methods — you may be able to prolong the life of even very mature oil wells. Companies like Apache have turned this into a speciality. If there are fewer discoveries of “easy” oil, this effort becomes more worthwhile. Also such technologies are getting better by the day. Who knos, we might be able to get another third out of the ground…. although that would really bake the planet.
Better energy efficiency would certainly extend the timeline.
Also there may still be new oil reserves that we have not yet uncovered.
Sorry these answers are not terribly specific. Hope that helps a bit.