China may stub its toe on rare earths quotas

December 30, 2010

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

HONG KONG — China may stub its toe on its rare earths quotas. By restricting exports of the metallic elements, it is hoping to give domestic industries a boost. But Chinese companies will lose if the move leads to trade restrictions or boycotts of overseas acquisitions. If Beijing is serious about addressing environmental concerns, it should cut rare earths production, not exports.

Rare earths, a group of 17 related elements, are used in electronic devices and clean energy technology. Though China controls just 36 percent of the world’s rare earths reserves, it supplies 97 percent of global demand, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Cutting export quotas will make sure that, in the short term, more production using rare earths will stay in China. Reopening mines takes time, and there is limited operational expertise outside China.

Though the move raises trade concerns, the World Trade Organisation can’t twist China’s arm. WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy has said that export restrictions on resources are very difficult to address under existing provisions. Securing access to resources wasn’t a political priority when trade rules were set up 60 years ago.

Nevertheless, countries worried about losing access to strategic raw materials may take the law into their own hands. The U.S. Trade Representative’s office says it is “very concerned” about China’s quota cut. Washington is already in dispute with Beijing over tyres and solar subsidies. It could impose more tariffs on Chinese imports, or restrict high-tech exports to China. Japan’s Sony Corp.  has threatened to source fewer products from China.

Besides, China is heavily dependent on imports of other raw materials. It is the world’s largest buyer of iron ore, and is scouring the globe to secure access to strategic resources. Export quotas send a bad signal.

Beijing says its goal is to reduce the environmental damage caused by extracting rare earths. If so, it should limit supply, not exports. China has been reducing rare earths export quotas since 2006. Yet, according to the OECD, production has risen 8 percent to 11 percent a year in the past decade — in line with global demand. Supply limits would not aid domestic industry. But they would help silence China’s foreign critics.

Comments

dispute with Beijing over ”tyres” and solar subsidies

It’s ‘tires’. :) Shake a finger at your editor!

==RED

Posted by REDruin | Report as abusive
 

RED, I believe that is British (and thus HK) standard…

Posted by TFF | Report as abusive
 

More than a toe-stub is the likelihood of causing other countries to redevelop their former mines. The threat of a cutoff is a much stronger incentive to have alternate supplies that the slow boil of raising prices. If the US sees it as a national security issue, ordinary economic concerns will not apply.

Posted by m11213 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/