<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU bank levy idea is circular &#8212; and dangerous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/01/12/eu-bank-levy-idea-is-circular-and-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/01/12/eu-bank-levy-idea-is-circular-and-dangerous/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedrodude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/01/12/eu-bank-levy-idea-is-circular-and-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>pedrodude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=5091#comment-5841</guid>
		<description>And how exactly is the EU going to accurately predict the benefit from the one or two occasions when it would prove a lifesaver, compared to the detrimental effect on lending and spending by not drawing that liquidity away from the market?  And won&#039;t this put a burden on successful banks and prop up unsuccessful member states [and indirectly, their banks].

At least without a safety net, banks and member states will be more inclined towards a less risky stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how exactly is the EU going to accurately predict the benefit from the one or two occasions when it would prove a lifesaver, compared to the detrimental effect on lending and spending by not drawing that liquidity away from the market?  And won&#8217;t this put a burden on successful banks and prop up unsuccessful member states [and indirectly, their banks].</p>
<p>At least without a safety net, banks and member states will be more inclined towards a less risky stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
