America shouldn’t fear German takeover of NYSE

By Reuters Staff
February 14, 2011

By Rob Cox and Agnes T. Crane
The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.

Americans shouldn’t fear a German takeover of the New York Stock Exchange. U.S. politicians are getting antsy — even about the merged entity’s name — and some may use the deal to criticize last year’s financial reform legislation. That’s a superficial and illogical response. NYSE’s purchase of Euronext didn’t emasculate European markets, and this deal won’t ruin America’s. What happens on markets matters more than who owns them.

That doesn’t mean New York Senator Charles Schumer isn’t entitled to insist, as he did over the weekend, that the merged entity put the New York brand first. It’s in his interest to promote his home town as global financial center. And he may have saved the new group some fees on fancy communications consultations. The Big Apple and its connotations make for a better brand than the generically Teutonic alternative.

But for New York to thrive as a financial center, it needs its backers to move on from an antiquated picture of the Big Board as a floor where burly men wave pieces of paper representing General Electric shares — or as a place where only stocks are traded. For the city to retain its role as a financial hub it must lead in innovation and technology and above all represent itself as a place where the interests of investors are well served.

On its own, NYSE Euronext was already in danger of losing out in this race. In addition to a traditional battle with Nasdaq in new stock listings and with the Chicago exchanges in the innovation of indexes, futures and other derivatives, dozens of rival trading platforms financed by the NYSE’s biggest customers have steadily eroded the profitability of its once-core stock trading business.

The Euronext deal in 2007 gave the NYSE access to a lucrative European derivatives business, whose operating profits now top those generated by the combined company’s cash trading and listing services. Moreover, because electronic trading has made cash transactions a volume game, a tie-up with Deutsche Boerse should channel more business New York’s way. The German group’s Eurex joint venture also owns ISE, a big U.S. options exchange. The planned partnership — even one where NYSE shareholders only call 40 percent of the shots — should bolster New York’s position.

Moreover, though exchanges are going global, regulation is still a local affair. That helped overcome parochial sentiment in Europe when NYSE merged with Euronext. Legislators worried about the future should focus more on keeping America’s financial centers on top by promoting fairness, good corporate governance and impeccable transparency. A name, after all, is just a name.

Comments

First of all, the Germans aren’t “taking over” anything. Anyone in this branch knows they (Germany), are running on fumes, financially speaking. Check Deutsche Börse financials, they have lost regularly for the last 2 years. NYSE Euronext, is not the NYSE, different animal. Let them have 60% ownership, when the correction hits, and it will…Germany gets wiped out financially in one move. There’s your market collapse, and the end of the EURO currency combined, and all will sleep well. Germany has been lying for years about their financial problems.Germany’s final lesson learned, “quit comparing yourselves to countries 10 X your size”, imagine them thinking they could ever run with the big dogs! Socialism at it’s finest there my German Comrades, didn’t work, huh?

Posted by DrV | Report as abusive
 

World Government here we come. Whomever owns the means by which trading is possible is extremely important and not insignificant as the article suggests. Every time we turn around someone wants to sell our country out. First it was our ports, another area of strategic importance. Then it was our airspace. Now its the stock exchange. Pretty soon foreign countries or foreign entities will be controlling our vital infrastructure, not Americans. How come no one is concerned about any possible threat implications. What if Germany wanted to screw us? They could very easily if they have control over the exchange market. We all know how the world really works and we have to seriously consider what should be off limits. We cannot afford to expose ourselves so much. What’s next, China controlling our power grid by merging with our power grid companies?

Posted by Blackbird1996 | Report as abusive
 

Interesting that our politicians made more of a fuss over the merger of Budweiser and Imbev. Based on what has transpired elsewhere given mergers of oil companies, banks, and even in the beer industry, (i.e. higher prices due to decreased competition in the market, greater control of our politicians, erosion of nationalism, shady accounting practices, decreased tax receipts, etc.) I think this merger should be quashed. It is not in the best interests of the American people.

Posted by Soothsayer | Report as abusive
 

It is no surprise; everything in the USA is for sale. The senate, congress, the white house and the news.

Posted by RufusDaddy | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/