Fed transparency puts Goldman’s Cohn in a pickle

April 1, 2011

– The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own –

By Agnes T. Crane

The Federal Reserve’s 25,000-page data dump on bank borrowings so far hasn’t unearthed any shocking revelations or sent financial markets into a tailspin. But it has caught out Goldman Sachs Chief Operating Officer Gary Cohn. Last year, Cohn told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, under oath, that Goldman tapped the Fed’s discount window — the mechanism that allows banks to get emergency funding — once for a “de minimus” amount of money.

At least he got the amount right. Goldman hit the Fed up for less than $60 million. Yes, that’s an “M” for million. But, it went to the discount window five times from the fall of 2008 to early 2010. The biggest drawdown was also the first, of $50 million. It’s possible that Cohn was only aware of this one, given its size and the timing — Sept. 23 2008, when the crisis was in full swing. It’s hardly the kind of cover-up conspiracy theorists may have hoped for. Yet, it’s still another public relations snafu — though more of a 2 than a “God’s work” 9 — for a bank that is still cleaning up its post-crisis image.

The Federal Reserve fought hard to keep information on its borrowings under wraps. A lawsuit forced its hand. And the Dodd-Frank Act makes sure the veil remains lifted. Even though bankers like JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon reckon such open books will keep banks away, it’s hard to see how a misstep by Cohn — if that’s the most controversial item found in the data trove — will cause banks to boycott the lender of last resort when crisis strikes.

Dodd-Frank mandates disclosure, but grants the Fed a two-year lag. On Wall Street, two years is a lifetime. To investors, history is of interest but not concern: to wit, Goldman shares were up 2 percent Friday. Yet it’s still important to keep the record straight. It forces bank executives to take a closer look at their own records, if for no other reason than to avoid embarrassing misstatements that could come back to haunt them.

Comments

[...] Sachs said it went to the window only once; in fact, as Agnes Crane of Reuters Breakingviews notes, it went five times.There are two controversies surrounding the disclosure. One is whether the Fed [...]

 

[...] Sachs said it went to the window only once; in fact, as Agnes Crane of Reuters Breakingviews notes, it went five [...]

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/