Syrian crackdown stamps on economic dream

April 11, 2011

By Una Galani
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

LONDON — Syria’s crackdown will stamp on its economic dream. Bashar al-Assad’s regime had an ambitious plan to quadruple foreign investment and boost tourism in order to drive growth in a poor country with dwindling oil. But the violent suppression of protestors will scare off both investors and tourists.

When George W. Bush was U.S. president, Syria was brought into an expanded “axis of evil”, which included countries like Iran. But until last month, Assad was having some success in normalising relations with the West. The United States recently appointed its first ambassador to the country in years. Assad jetted around Western capitals, portraying Syria as on the path to modernisation. There was even a glossy profile earlier this year of his photogenic wife in American Vogue.

Against that backdrop, Syria’s plans to improve infrastructure by attracting foreign direct investment worth $55 billion by 2015 — roughly equivalent to its entire annual GDP — looked plausible, even though current FDI is around just $2.5 billion a year. The same was true of Syria’s five-year goal to capitalise on its rich history by boosting tourism a further 40 percent to reach over 12 million visitors a year. Indeed, tourist numbers were up 40 percent last year alone.

This would have helped Syria achieve its growth target of 5 percent to 6 percent a year over the next five years. While that’s not much faster than in previous years, it would have offset the steady decline in oil related revenues, currently around 5 percent of GDP, and problems in agriculture — an even bigger pillar of the economy which, in a good year, accounts for as much as one quarter of GDP.

But the escalating violence in Syria has left the country’s economic plans looking more like a fantasy. While over 70 percent of visitors to Syria come from the Arab region — a chunk of tourism that may not be so easily frightened away — it was from Europe that Syria hoped to attract the bulk of new big-spending tourists. Equally, it was from the West that Syria aimed to bring in new investment. Every bullet fired makes that less likely.

Comments

Just goes to show that you cannot hope to develop and sustain a open economy without the inevitable social revolution. Whats going on in Syria is ahead of the game and hopefully in the long run it will benefit the people there.

I think a good question to ask is; “will Saudi Arabia allow Syria to plunge into civil war/ would they be willing to let western forces intervene there for the sake of democracy?

Also, How will Israel and Lebanon respond to any new form of government in Syria? I could see freedom fighters streaming into Syria and an itchy Israel fearing that any new state may take on a more extremist position. We have to remember that Syria’s borders are just lines on a map.

I’m hoping for a more peaceful outcome, but that is very unlikely because the west let Egypt’s Mubarak go to jail when he should have been rewarded for letting democracy win. There is no incentive for any other abusive dictators to step down voluntarily.

Posted by kc10man | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/