U.S. GDP data starts to spell stagflation
By Martin Hutchinson
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
WASHINGTON — It’s starting to feel like stagflation in America. Gross domestic product rose just 1.8 percent in the first quarter, despite the injection of additional fiscal stimulus in December. At the same time, the Fed’s chosen measure of inflation — the personal consumption expenditures deflator — rose 3.8 percent. If the trends aren’t temporary and oil prices don’t retreat, the Fed may find itself scrambling.
The first-quarter rise in GDP is weaker than it looks, for two reasons. First, half of it derived from a build-up in inventories, which may weigh on future growth. Second, while most of the bipartisan December stimulus consisted of extending the Bush tax cuts, with no short-term effect on the economy, it also included a one-year reduction of 2 percent in employees’ social security contributions, estimated to cost $112 billion and entering pay packets in January. That boosted personal income, which rose at an 8.3 percent annual rate in the quarter, and should have increased growth.
Instead, prices increased so fast that even though the savings rate increased only marginally, real personal consumption rose only at a modest 2.7 percent. With government cutting back and construction weak, GDP growth was sluggish.
From this point on, there is no further stimulus available, either monetary or fiscal. Budgetary constraints are likely to cut state spending further, and inventories are unlikely to increase when growth is slow. As a result, price pressures from global commodity and energy markets may hit future GDP growth. On the inflation front, the PCE deflator is already far outstripping the Fed’s 2011 forecast range, released on April 27, of 2.1 percent to 2.8 percent, suggesting the Fed’s immobility on interest rates is producing increasingly negative real rates, boosting inflation.
The economic picture could change abruptly, as it did in 2008, when the oil and commodity price spiral reversed and inflation dissipated. Of course, that came at the cost of a major financial crash and economic downturn. There’s no easy exit.


Comments RSS
I wonder what Bernanke is going to do when he finally realizes his theories are wrong and his plan isn’t working. Right now he is in denial. Economy slowing down? It’s just temporary, it will pick up again. Inflation going up? It’s just temporary, it will slow down again. In the end I imagine he will go home and put a bullet through his head, poor man. But that will not be of much comfort to the rest of us.
I never thought I’d say this, but it appears that Mr. Bernanke has slipped up, badly. Printing money – in the hundreds of billions between QE1 and QE2 – turns out to have been just a catalyst for inflation, as many pundits predicted. Mr. Obama’s reckless borrowing and spending binge coupled with his unstated policy of driving down the US dollar certainly isn’t helping. What did Mr. Obama think would happen to commodity prices given a US dollar meltdown? Sorceror’s apprentices, indeed. This will end badly.
Prices have gone up, but core inflation still hasn’t made a significant shift. There is no reason to begin to panic right now. If gas prices have hit a new normal and crop yeilds continue to be low for the forseable future, then infaltion will be a major concern. However, history suggests that the price of oil (gas) will come down and crop yeilds will increase. So while prices are high now, they are ot likely to remain that way.
Bernanke said that the price of oil (gas)and food will not remain high for a long time…that is stupid, because as long as he debase the Dollar value and print more money, the price of energy will not come down !!. It is not about the supply and demand, it’s just LOGICAL investors are so Greedy to increase their wealth by borrowing the CHEAP Dollar, that is through commodities-thus Energy and the Metal prices will continue to go up. Go Ahead make a Loan and join the USD CARRY TRADE PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let’s review — we had a financial crisis caused by the banking industry which Bernanke came from. Bernanke and the Goldman Sachs contingent in Treasury decided that the solution to having too much leverage was to leverage up big time — inject more stimulus than had ever been done in history. The best thing you can say about that approach was that it deferred the pain while it made the investment bankers rich (again). We have one branch of government printing money recklessly while another branch of government buys that same debt, and everyone pretends that things are fine. The emperor has no clothes, and the day of reckoning is coming, whether this is the 3rd year of the president’s term or not. In summer of 2007, the news about the mortgage crisis was fully known, yet the stock market kept making record highs right through December. What we are seeing now is deja vu all over again, as Yogi Berra would say.
Stagflation is not the most likely outcome today, because a habit of low inflation has been established. However, I am concerned that the Federal Reserve Bank doesn’t see a relationship between people working and spending. When the cost of capital is too low the situation exists like in Japan’s lost decade where the risks of hiring a worker are much greater than the risks of buying overly expensive equipment.
Stagflation comes from underutilization of the workforce coupled with low capital costs that make it nearly riskless to to displace workers with machines. Instead of productivity gains the result is a shortage of consumers, while nations that better utilized their workforce compete for natural resources driving up natural resource prices, such as to manufacture machines with Busnesses compensate for the lack of consumers by raising pricing margins in order to meet fixed costs. The lack of consumers is the “stag,” while the need for higher margins is the “flation”
GOOD!