Microsoft’s $8.5 bln Skype price is in the cloud

May 10, 2011

By Richard Beales
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Microsoft has only recently embraced the Internet cloud. But from shareholders’ perspective, that’s certainly where its $8.5 billion deal to buy Skype belongs. In theory, there are potential advantages. In practice, Microsoft’s poor M&A track record and the high price mean the transaction is unlikely ever to connect for investors.

The idea is that Microsoft can integrate Skype’s voice, video and messaging tools with its Office email and other software and with its mobile operating system. A recent deal with Nokia may help promote Microsoft’s smartphone platform, which is currently an also-ran. Adding Skype, one of the few Internet names other than Google to become a verb, could help — for instance to compete with Apple’s FaceTime video calling. And gaining a Microsoft-like acceptance behind corporate firewalls might extend Skype’s reach.

That all sounds good. But the $6 billion purchase of online advertising group aQuantive in 2007 — Microsoft boss Steve Ballmer’s largest purchase ever until this one — hasn’t borne any noticeable fruit in the battle with Google. Neither has the software giant’s search deal with Yahoo. Yet the price Ballmer has put on Skype — astoundingly the result of an unsolicited offer, not an auction — would require it to add huge value.

When Skype filed for an initial public offering late last year, a $5 billion price tag looked optimistic. Microsoft’s price is virtually 10 times revenue. Even Google only manages a bit over five times. Put another way, Ballmer is paying more than 400 times last year’s operating income. Skype, now with 170 million monthly users, is a fast-growing business — monthly users increased 38 percent last year to 145 million, with paying users up 19 percent. But to turn that operating income into a 10 percent annual return on investment, even pre-tax, it has to grow 40-fold.

Microsoft had $50 billion of cash and short-term investments at the end of March, so it can easily afford Skype. But it’s hard to see how the outlay, even from cash held abroad, is going to break even for the company’s shareholders. Microsoft was the biggest U.S. stock market loser in market capitalization terms late on Tuesday morning, dropping nearly $3 billion. That suggests investors have a different verb in mind than Skype.

Comments

IE and Microsoft products unlike Google products slow down your computer.
I have restricted internet access for outlook in the antivirus to eliminate slow down. I use Google browser to check my outlook email, and it works like a dream.
Microsoft has to go on the cloud, and offer at least basic computing free similar to Google, to remain competitive in the long run.
Cloud computing is natural progression in computing.
I hope Microsoft does not make using IE a requirement to use Skype, or start charging for Skype video talk. That will take many users away, because IE & outlook is more vulnerable to viruses on the internet.

Posted by Bob_Andersen | Report as abusive
 

While Microsoft’s http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/office365  / takeover of Skype is good for all its stakeholders, you cannot help but hear the groans of Skype users when this news broke. Microsoft is a well known profit-seeking company and ad placements can very quickly ruin Skype user experience. Let’s hope that Microsoft can do so with inclinations to the user so that Skype can continue to be a user friendly and reliable service.

Posted by MichaelHost | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/