http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/07/22/microsoft-ought-to-kick-off-search-for-bing-buyer/ Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/07/22/microsoft-ought-to-kick-off-search-for-bing-buyer/comment-page-1/#comment-8364 NaziaHS Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:59:20 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/?p=6649#comment-8364 How can Microsoft think of attracting IT freaks with Bing with all those unattractive colors and home page? Forget advertising scheme and methods to call customers, the efficiency of search results is very low and displayed as an old gadget fashion icon. The only reason Google is smart because of it's advertisement and link up sites that carry the tittle "Google" along. If Microsoft wants a good search robot then they should buy Google or smartly beat Google through it's own title like Miclool, Microsearch or Microfind. Microsoft itself is a brand and it can use it's name for making a search tool famous. It doesn't need Bing, and even if it does then it needs lot of hard work in changing the title, it's outlook and mainly the results of pressing Enter button. How can Microsoft think of attracting IT freaks with Bing with all those unattractive colors and home page? Forget advertising scheme and methods to call customers, the efficiency of search results is very low and displayed as an old gadget fashion icon. The only reason Google is smart because of it’s advertisement and link up sites that carry the tittle “Google” along. If Microsoft wants a good search robot then they should buy Google or smartly beat Google through it’s own title like Miclool, Microsearch or Microfind. Microsoft itself is a brand and it can use it’s name for making a search tool famous. It doesn’t need Bing, and even if it does then it needs lot of hard work in changing the title, it’s outlook and mainly the results of pressing Enter button.

]]>