Why Apple might just be the first $1 trillion company

August 9, 2011

By Robert Cyran
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Could Apple be worth $1 trillion? It’s conceivable. The $342 billion iPhone and iPad maker became – if only briefly – the most valuable company in the United States when it surpassed Exxon Mobil on Aug. 9. Yet its sales have been surging 80 percent a year, and profit faster. And Apple trades roughly in line with the growing U.S. market — and at less than half the price-to-earnings multiple it fetched in 2006, when revenue growth was much slower.

Apple now trades at about 11 times estimated earnings for the fiscal year ending September 2012. The S&P 500 index is valued at about 10 times next year’s earnings. But Apple’s sales growth is not far off 10 times faster than that of the average company. The gadget producer also sits on $76 billion of cash and investments.

To get at this dissonance another way, consider Apple’s PEG ratio. This hints at the price of growth by dividing a company’s PE ratio by its projected percentage earnings growth. A smaller figure suggests a company is cheaper. Apple’s is 0.2. That’s low compared to growth darlings. Burrito purveyor Chipotle Mexican Grill, for instance, comes in at 2.1, and Salesforce.com at 13.2. Pandora and LinkedIn aren’t even expected to make money.

Alternatively, put Apple on the same PE multiple it traded on in 2006, and it would be worth almost $900 billion. A premium for today’s faster growth could get it to $1 trillion. Apple can’t be so cheap just because Steve Jobs is in precarious health.

True, Apple already sells more per quarter than it did in all of fiscal 2007, and it takes more and more success to move the needle. Growth could easily slow. Yet the smartphone and tablet markets are young, the company’s customers show remarkable fidelity, and areas such as television are ripe for new gadgets. Moreover, Apple’s return on equity is almost twice what it was in 2006, suggesting it has pricing power.

Maybe investors simply can’t fathom so large a company. A $1 trillion Apple would mean adding all of Microsoft, Google, Intel and Amazon — and more to the firm’s current market capitalization. Perhaps Apple is correctly priced, the market too expensive, and growth stocks grotesquely so. But something doesn’t add up. In relative terms, Apple should be worth far more.

Comments

It’s hard to believe that back in the 90′s Apple almost went bellie-up and Microsoft made an investment to keep Apple alive. I wonder if MS still has a stake in Apple?

Posted by NotPleased | Report as abusive
 

Hi Robert, Interesting post. I did an interesting analysis to check the robustness of Apple’s Business Model. In that analysis, Apple score 10 of 10. Very few companies in the World would be able to score 10 of 10. Please check out the analysis at http://jitendermiglani.wordpress.com/201 1/08/11/apple-business-model-score-10-ou t-of-10/

Posted by jitendermiglani | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/