New Morgan Stanley woe is a drama lacking a crisis
By Antony Currie
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinionsĀ expressed are his own.
Morgan Stanleyās October woes feel like a drama lacking a crisis. The Wall Street firm, which three years ago suffered a bank run, was already facing skepticism about its turnaround before the third quarter turned crummy. But thatās not behind its latest misery. Morgan Stanleyās stock tanked more than 10 percent on Friday after the cost of insuring its debt against default rose as investors again got the jitters about the investment bankās exposure to Europe. But substance to the worries looks thin.
A blog post on Zero Hedge two weeks ago snowballed into the recent rumblings. It asserted that Morgan Stanley had $39 billion of French bank risk on its balance sheet -ā more than half its book value. But these numbers dated to 2010. The bank run by James Gorman has almost halved that figure. Whatās more, the blog picked only the gross exposure, which includes client assets, and those of the bank, held at French institutions. It ignores cash, hedges and collateral. Factor those in, according to a person familiar with the numbers, and the net exposure is zilch.
Of course, 2008 taught investors not to take banks at their word about exposures — or the quality of their hedges. Morgan Stanley itself had a near-$10 billion loss in 2007 from disastrously hedging an otherwise-smart mortgage bet.
So investors are skittish. But even after its recent rout, Morgan Stanley shares are hardly out of whack with rivals. Like CitigroupĀ it trades just below half of book value, but far better than Bank of Americaās 30 percent of assets minus liabilities. Even JPMorganĀ and Goldman Sachs, which navigated the last crisis deftly, are barely trading above two-thirds of book. Under pressure to show its turnaround in fixed-income trading and wealth management is working, Morgan Stanley ought to trade at a discount anyway.
That doesnāt mean Gorman should hold his breath and wish for the latest ruckus to pass. Providing more information on the how the firm hedges its exposures, and who with, would help ā- and heās likely to do that when announcing earnings later this month. Of course, as the autumn of 2008 taught investors, once a panic over funding and capital hits a bank, all bets are off. Gorman may need to get out even further in front of this one.