MF Global’s failure vindicates Volcker Rule

October 31, 2011

By Antony Currie
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The failure of MF Global leaves egg on many faces. Paul Volcker and Barack Obama are among those to escape the mess. When the president added the complex proposal bearing the former Federal Reserve chairman’s name to new sweeping financial regulation last year, it looked like overkill. But the bankruptcy of the brokerage and wannabe investment bank run by Jon Corzine reinforces the idea that the ability to bet a firm’s own capital belongs only where its damage to the system can be limited.

MF Global fits squarely in that bracket for now. It’s not a bank, so can’t tap into taxpayer funds by way of the Fed’s emergency liquidity window in a crisis. Moreover, at $41 billion, MF Global’s balance sheet is less than a tenth the size that of Lehman Brothers when it collapsed in September 2008.

The firm’s drive to expand from middleman to risk-taker only picked up speed when Corzine took over in March 2010. That makes it a small operation by market standards, meaning there shouldn’t be much if any spillover of MF Global’s problems. Of course, there’s always the chance a Chapter 11 filing of any financial firm unearths wider hazards.

Either way, it’s a reminder that everyone from watchdogs to investors can’t let down their guard on the risks traders take. In this case, all seem to have done so. MF Global committed similar errors to those laid bare by the financial crisis. At times, it heaped on excessive leverage of around 30-to-1. And its $6 billion-odd position in European sovereign debt was, at 15 percent of its balance sheet, far too concentrated.

Shareholders obviously overlooked these factors. So did bondholders, who instead focused on the possibility of Corzine, a former New Jersey senator and governor, returning to politics, evidenced by certain interest rate clauses written into the firm’s debt.

Regulators bear some blame, too. Not only did they leave MF Global alone until summer, the Fed actually anointed the overextended brokerage a primary dealer in U.S. bonds earlier this year. That makes getting regulations like the Volcker Rule written and implemented correctly all the more significant.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

The Volcker Rule certainly is vindicated, but that won’t stop Republicans from doing everything they can to gut those regulations.

They have to meet their taskmasters’ expectations.

Posted by breezinthru | Report as abusive

anthony, point well taken. not only should watchdogs and investors monitor risk positions, but I think more importantly, the most senior managers at the actual institutions need to monitor whats going on under their roofs. Here, I believe Corzine should bear a tremendous responsibility. How could he and his staff allowed themselves to have over 15% of their BS riding on any one category, let alone European debt obligations? The fact that they were levered (per your article) at 30-1 indicates a lack of internal awareness or pure stupidity on the part of the risk management team. Of all people, I would have expected corzine to have been on top of this in light of the financial turmoil realized by our banks. Cant wait to see the lawsuits from this.

Posted by puzzled | Report as abusive


Vlocker would have done nothing here…zero.

Posted by TxFire1 | Report as abusive