Equity-bond decoupling shows risks have changed

November 17, 2011

By Robert Cole
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Investors may be rethinking the inherent riskiness of equities, especially compared to bonds. It’s a logical response to seismic shifts in the euro sovereign debt markets.

Normally, shares would be expected to suffer alongside bonds at these troubled times. After all, equities come at the bottom of the creditors’ pecking order, making them among the riskiest of financial assets. Investors might be expected to flee from stocks since bond market woes reflect, at least in part, fears of recession.

But leading equity indexes such as the Stoxx 600 and MSCI World have suffered only modest falls recently. US shares show gains over in the short and medium term. And the latest Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey of fund managers suggests that equity market sentiment is improving, especially in the United States.

Several factors sustain hope for shares. On one side, the crisis has cut into the appeal of bonds. Euro zone sovereign risk, once thought vanishingly small, has grown. Even if there are no defaults (other than Greece), the possibility makes all bonds look relatively more risky, and shares relatively less so.

Meanwhile, companies on average have strong enough balance sheets to stand aside from what is essentially a debt crisis. Aside from financial stocks – which investors would do well to treat separately just now anyway – companies tend not have exposure to government bonds.

True, the weakening economic outlook means that corporate earnings growth may slow. But Thomson Reuters’ Starmine database suggests that year-on-year earnings, globally, will rise 11.8 percent over the next 12 months. Commercial life in Europe may be tougher, but if continuing euro zone woes prompt concerted intervention from, say, the European Central Bank, euro shares could draw benefit alongside bonds.

For multinationals, exposure to global industrial consumer markets is a plus. In general, corporate cashflows underpin – though still do not guarantee – valuations. Compared to historic norms, those valuations suggest shares have limited scope for further declines, barring complete catastrophe. And the prices of traditional safe haven assets – U.S. Treasuries or gold for instance – are so high as to look as if they are riding for a fall.

Equities aren’t invincible. But they are pretty well equipped for these rough times.

Comments

The correlation dynamics are interesting here, and certainly equity markets do seem to have “decoupled” from sovereign bond markets in (linear) correlation terms. But I think that this gives further testament to the non-linear, irrational and inefficient nature of financial markets (relative to what is conventionally assumed at least).

I think Equity-markets seem have simply become somewhat desensitized to the protracted & high-pitched state of crisis in the Eurozone, and have fallen back upon other elements of the investment mosaic. The apparent remoteness of the EU crisis affords this luxury where the fallout from any shock (EMU dissolution) will be felt through 2nd+ round effects (but felt nonetheless). EU Sovereign bond manager’s don’t have this luxury where the crisis is expanding on more and more fronts, and all its consequences are both proximate and acute (ptf mark-to-market, liquidity, counterparty-risk, wholesale/interbank etc).

I believe that were the situation to suffer another shock (e.g. uncovered peripheral govy auction), this US-equity reprieve will prove itself to be transitory and the consequences of an EMU dissolution vis-a-vis global recession/depression will be brought to the front very much once more for the Equity markets. Here consensus estimates (Reuters Starmine) will prove themselves to have been a totally useless indicator in the context of a latent but acute threat of global recession, which if actualized will then inevitably trigger earnings-revisions to allow valuation multiples to find a floor.

Posted by whirdym | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/