<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. energy bill beneficiary redefines going green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard1956</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-8714</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard1956</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=8059#comment-8714</guid>
		<description>The obvious way to resolve this problem is BEFORE winning elections, members should be in ALL CASH, no stock or gold or commodities.  Nor should they be allowed to buy any securities while in office.  Either that or recuse any voting.  They need to be totally impartial without any financial gain based on their voting decisions.  It may not ever really happen but that is the only real way to solve this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious way to resolve this problem is BEFORE winning elections, members should be in ALL CASH, no stock or gold or commodities.  Nor should they be allowed to buy any securities while in office.  Either that or recuse any voting.  They need to be totally impartial without any financial gain based on their voting decisions.  It may not ever really happen but that is the only real way to solve this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGillman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-8710</link>
		<dc:creator>JGillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=8059#comment-8710</guid>
		<description>I Broke the news on this in 2008 with my post http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/08/giving-us-gas/

Pelosi is a crook.  She held this country hostage to $4/gallon gas collapsing the working poor income and contributing to mortgage default.

All so she could have her own little windfall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Broke the news on this in 2008 with my post <a href='http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/08/giving-us-gas/'>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/ 08/giving-us-gas/</a></p>
<p>Pelosi is a crook.  She held this country hostage to $4/gallon gas collapsing the working poor income and contributing to mortgage default.</p>
<p>All so she could have her own little windfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbabbitt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator>mbabbitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=8059#comment-8708</guid>
		<description>I love it: Liberals and their obsession with Haliburton. With Obama, the list is so long you can&#039;t keep up. Solyndra, GE just to name a few. And now that company that got the military sweetheart deal of $16 per gallon for biofuel. Excusing bad behavior because its end is good in your eyes is just an excuse for massive corruption, which we are seeing today in the Obama Administration. Oh yes, then there&#039;s that smallpox vaccine no one needed. And the other solar company that took 1.2 billion loan dollars that&#039;s on the verge of imploding.  What a record to write about, showing such integrity and transparency. NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it: Liberals and their obsession with Haliburton. With Obama, the list is so long you can&#8217;t keep up. Solyndra, GE just to name a few. And now that company that got the military sweetheart deal of $16 per gallon for biofuel. Excusing bad behavior because its end is good in your eyes is just an excuse for massive corruption, which we are seeing today in the Obama Administration. Oh yes, then there&#8217;s that smallpox vaccine no one needed. And the other solar company that took 1.2 billion loan dollars that&#8217;s on the verge of imploding.  What a record to write about, showing such integrity and transparency. NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuffaloGirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/14/u-s-energy-bill-beneficiary-redefines-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-8706</link>
		<dc:creator>BuffaloGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=8059#comment-8706</guid>
		<description>One name immediately comes to mind - Haliburton? At least the company Pelosi has an interest in is one that has potential to do more good.  AND she disclosed her conflict of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One name immediately comes to mind &#8211; Haliburton? At least the company Pelosi has an interest in is one that has potential to do more good.  AND she disclosed her conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
