Wukan protests rooted in finance not freedoms

By Wei Gu
December 19, 2011

By Wei Gu
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own

The siege of Wukan isn’t about freedoms but finance. Residents of the large village in southern China’s Guangdong province have driven out the authorities, and held daily protests with thousands of participants, after a dispute about land sales by the local government. In modern China this isn’t such a surprise: as prices of land rise and supply gets scarcer, citizens like Wukan’s want more of the profits. China’s model of rapid development is due for an overhaul.

Wukan’s villagers are angry because the local government sold land to a developer, and failed to compensate them properly. Land in China that is owned in name by village collectives can still be sold by local officials on their behalf for profits. Wukan’s villagers, judging by slogans like “We love the Communist Party”, aren’t calling for bold political changes. They can probably be appeased by a bigger slice of sale proceeds.

Yet this high-profile incident presents central authorities with a dilemma. They want the protests to die out, but giving Wukan villagers more money could encourage similar riots elsewhere. Nor can they afford to give everyone their full share of land revenues. While some officials in Wukan were accused of being corrupt, all local governments depend on land sales to help finance public spending, such as building new roads, schools, and hospitals.

China’s development model is pulling in two ways. On one hand, governments are more strapped for cash, and calls for them to finance public housing projects put more strain on budgets. That makes them more likely to sell land they shouldn’t. There were 37,000 of cases of illegal land sales by local governments in the first nine months of 2011, up 4 percent from the same period of 2010, official figures show. On the other hand, citizens can see that property prices have shot up, and they demand better compensation.

China’s development model of selling land to finance development can’t be sustained. One positive change would be for the well-financed central government to contribute more to local spending, so local governments can rely less on land revenues. For now protests like Wukan’s are financially motivated, but could still be a real political headache if handled improperly.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

It is not that they do NOT desire for freedom. They don’t want to be seen as trouble maker against the central government. They still fear for the consequences. All they want is to keep on with their normal life, that is what an ordinary people want. If they are pushed to the corner then they have no way to turn but rebel. There is NOT much difference that they fight for finance or freedoms. They fight for their right and they fight for their justice. They got the support from ordinary Chinese all over the other cities in China who felt that their basic right have been denied by the corrupted government for too long.

Posted by Molly88 | Report as abusive