<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The poorly performing, must-have 2012 investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/22/the-poorly-performing-must-have-2012-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/22/the-poorly-performing-must-have-2012-investment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonLack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2011/12/22/the-poorly-performing-must-have-2012-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-8721</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonLack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=8209#comment-8721</guid>
		<description>Hedge Funds have failed to beat 60/40 stocks bonds since 2002, and at $2 Trillion in AUM the 8% return suggested above requires $160 Billion in annual profit, a figure the industry has never generated. Returns are likely to continue to disappoint. My book, The Hedge Fund Mirage, explains what went wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedge Funds have failed to beat 60/40 stocks bonds since 2002, and at $2 Trillion in AUM the 8% return suggested above requires $160 Billion in annual profit, a figure the industry has never generated. Returns are likely to continue to disappoint. My book, The Hedge Fund Mirage, explains what went wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
