U.S. shale exuberance may need to be tempered

January 3, 2012

By Christopher Swann
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

France’s Total and China’s Sinopec kicked off 2012 with $4.5 billion of deals with Chesapeake Energy and Devon Energy, respectively, to drill for U.S. shale oil and gas. Vast resources and technology in America should keep attracting foreign buyers. But the reaction by Ohio officials after several earthquakes suggests political risks will intensify.

Worries over hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, have been steadily rising. In spring 2011, Britain suspended the deep-excavation practice near Blackpool after minor tremors. The quake in Ohio, which prompted the state to suspend drilling at five wells, could be the start of a bigger setback. Until now, there has been only token resistance in Ohio. The weekend’s seismic movements threaten to galvanize the kind of public discontent that has been gathering strength in New York and Pennsylvania.

It also comes less than a month after a report from the Environmental Protection Agency offered the first tentative evidence that the fracturing process itself, rather than merely the careless disposal of waste fluids, can contaminate groundwater supplies.

Global energy companies may consider such hazards routine. After all, Total faced a complete ban on fracking at home. Political risk is an integral part of oil exploration. Exxon Mobil’s modest payout for the nationalization of its Venezuelan assets, less than a seventh the sum it was seeking, is another stark reminder. By comparison, the United States still looks a relatively safe place to invest. And shale drilling stands a good chance of being proven safe when conducted properly.

Still, greater public opprobrium over fracking and stricter government oversight both look likely in 2012. Such threats may not be fully reflected in the racy sums overseas buyers are willing to fork out for U.S. shale assets. Chesapeake’s latest sale in the Utica formation fetched a rich $15,000 an acre for largely unproven reserves. Prices are up from recent deals in Texas and North Dakota, with per-acre prices between $8,000 and $11,000.

Such asset inflation indicates that wide-eyed profit-seeking is trumping any fear of political risk. Big spenders would be wise to temper their exuberance.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Nice article !! To all readers I would like to suggest a documentary named ” GAS LAND” . Its a pretty good documentary raising the same issue , as discussed above !!

Posted by Aayuh_88 | Report as abusive

Gas-based fracking technology gets rid of the problems with water-based fracking. The technology is better, faster and cheaper, and is already being used in Canada. America needs to first shed its arrogance, then its ignorance, and talk about solutions rather than making excuses for this problem or that.

Posted by gwilde | Report as abusive

This Reuters reporter knows more about the risks and rewards of fracking than the geologists and economists and political scientists at the world’s major oil companies? Uh huh.

Posted by glenn101 | Report as abusive

Thank you Reuters and Christopher Swann. It takes courage to contradict the massive efforts of oil and gas producers to convince us that it’s somehow good to destroy our farmlands, roads, local cultures, air and water so that oil and gas producers can generate profits. The physical evidence in Northern Pennsylvania alone should send oil and gas back to the drawing boards. I hope they find a way to utilize all that gas. But the direct and side effects of High volume hydrofracking are clearly catastrophic. Stop it.

Posted by gschroder | Report as abusive