Fast-train UK hopes for some Olympic speed

January 11, 2012

By Ian Campbell
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The unthinkable has happened. The UK, traditionally associated with trains that stop all too often, is going ahead with a high-speed railway. Another sort of speed, of the Olympic variety, may mean the UK as a whole runs a bit faster than expected this year.

The decision to spend 32.7 billion pounds on a high-speed rail network is right. Faster transport assists economic integration and development. Quicker links to London will help the depressed Midlands.

The government is on the right track. It is cutting public expenditures which are less than useful while looking to increase investments for the long term. A brand new London airport would be another good idea.

But the fast track construction will be slow at best. If plans overcome obstacles, the big spending won’t begin for years. For now, the UK must cope with the loss of 193,000 public jobs in March to last September, more than enough to take steam out of a slow-moving economy.

Yet Christmas was not unmerry. The British Retail Consortium reported December retail sales 4.1 percent higher than in the previous year – the best month since January 2011. And purchasing managers in manufacturing and services were the most active in December since July. Low interest rates are helping British home-owners who remain employed.

The year just starting has its better side for consumers. Unlike in previous Januaries, there has been no increase in VAT. That will mean a marked fall in the inflation rate this January – to around 3.5 percent. And inflation should continue to fall, so that consumers won’t keep finding their incomes lagging well behind.

Meanwhile, more than the usual number of consumers will be imported. Tourist arrivals in 2012 are set to be high. The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee should draw many American visitors. The Olympic Games will also spur tourism and retail spending.

Many hurdles remain. The housing market is still depressed, the government is still cutting and the UK’s largest trading partner, the euro zone, has troubles that could easily spill into UK banks. But from a slow start the UK could accelerate this year, towards a recovery that future investments can enhance.

Comments

I have done computer modeling using evacuated tube transport system for London-Birmingham-Manchester-Leeds. The calculations are published at http://www.ioserver.com/Evacuated-Tube-T ransport.html. Click on “London-Birmingham-Manchester-Leeds” to see the calculations.

I estimate that it will cost less than 2 billion pounds for a 550 km link between these cities. At a cruising speed of 400 km/h it can handle 26,000 passengers per hour and 10 billion ton-km of freight per year. This network will also generate good revenue for the government. The travel time between London and Birmingham will be less than 25 minutes because this system does not need to stop between stations.

One thing that I have found with current fast train system is that there are very energy hungry. for example, the Shanghai maglev have to reduce its operating speed from 430km/h to 300km/h during off peak period to save on energy. Spending such large sum of money for a very energy inefficient system will be a very bad mistake.

Posted by IOServer | Report as abusive
 

Will the money come from Europe who has only debts like us. Or is this yet a further example of crass un economics.

We cannot afford the current state pensions We cannot afford to run our Hospitals We cannot afford to run our Universities and this Clown of Westminster guilty of bilking thousands over his house sales is supposed to be on whose side exactly.

Posted by nrssutton | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/