Facebook IPO lays bare Wall Street’s laggards

February 2, 2012

By Antony Currie

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Morgan Stanley can now officially lord Facebook over its Wall Street rivals. The potentially $100 billion social network’s initial public offering prospectus confirms that arch-rival Goldman Sachs lost the top spot in one of the most widely anticipated stock offerings in a generation. That’s a comedown after it botched an investment round for Facebook, but Goldman still remains on the roster of underwriters, along with JPMorgan, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays and Allen & Co. The bigger embarrassment is for those who didn’t make the cut.

One is Credit Suisse, a Silicon Valley stalwart even after tech banking maestro Frank Quattrone left. Last year, for example, it was one of the lead banks on Groupon’s IPO. Deutsche Bank is also nowhere to be seen, even though it, too, benefited from Quattrone’s services in the 1990s and bought Alex Brown, one of the so-called four horsemen that once dominated tech banking and the funding of growth companies.

But the big hometown absentee is Citi. The bailed-out megabank has had a harder time hoisting its flag on the West Coast, so expectations it would have nabbed a role in the Facebook deal might have been low. It must nevertheless be a disappointment, especially given the IPO’s links to a couple of the firm’s alumni. Citicorp Venture Capital veterans Arthur Patterson and Jim Swartz co-founded Accel Partners, the firm that turned a nearly $13 million Facebook investment into what could be $9 billion.

The Facebook advisers ultimately reflect a certain reality on Wall Street. Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and Citi are solidly in the lower half of the U.S. equity league tables. And Citi’s overall equity underwriting revenue of $672 million last year is a third lower than for rivals.

There’s still money to be made being in the second tier – and each of them may be added to the lower rung of Facebook’s underwriters later on. But the longer they linger there, the harder it will be to argue they’re part of the bulge bracket, at least in underwriting stock sales. And without Facebook, networking, whether socially online or in financial circles, will be all the more difficult.

Comments

I admire the firms that are not taking part in this. Facebook is the most over-hyped thing since the AOL-Time Warner merger. It reeks of dot-com bubble. Wake up people!

Posted by mrearlyadopter | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/