Romney tax row may bite European private equity
By Quentin Webb
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Mitt Romneyās low-tax private equity payouts caused a storm stateside. European buyout bosses are unlikely to run for high office. But, like the former Bain Capital boss fighting to clinch the Republican presidential nomination, they also cash in on ācarried interestā schemes which usually avoid income tax. The system is due a re-think on both sides of the Atlantic.
Carried interest arrangements typically entitle private equity partners to about a fifth of the profits from a successful fund. These can be life-changing sums. Say a 1 billion pound fund at a 12-partner London PE firm doubles its money and ācarried interestā kicks in after an annual hurdle rate of 8 percent. The lucky dozen could expect to receive an average 16.7 million pounds on top of regular pay and bonuses. Taxed as capital at the United Kingdomās 28 percent, the partners take home 12 million pounds. If it were taxed as income at Britainās top rate of 50 percent, the post-tax carry would be worth just 8.3 million.
The industry considers these payouts as rewards for patient entrepreneurship and therefore as capital gains. But while funds may need a decadeās nurturing, that rings hollow. Firstly, the capital staked is tiddling: the dozen in the example above may have invested a total of just 250,000 pounds. Secondly, outside investors usually also demand PE staff make separate āco-investmentsā on similar terms to everyone else. So they clearly doubt that partnersā ācarried interestā puts real capital at risk.
Britain has half-reformed its system already, moving in two steps from sub-10 percent tax to 28 percent after a 2007 backlash. In Stockholm, an important hub for buyouts, the tax authorities now reckon carry is income and are pursuing cases against several big PE houses.
To be sure, European rates are already higher than the U.S. ones. Exchequers wouldnāt get huge boosts, since the industryās still suffering bubble-era indigestion. And coordinated action would help, otherwise firms could simply switch between jurisdictions. Nevertheless, austerity has made financiersā pay a political battleground and tax loopholes, real and imagined, are vulnerable. The tide may be turning.