Two-speed euro zone risks permanent divide

February 17, 2012

By Ian Campbell

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The euro zone’s fourth-quarter numbers conjure images of an arduous pan-European cycling race. France and Germany are pulling away from the pack, while the countries of the periphery are bunched together, wobbling and falling further behind. Fiscal cuts are sapping the periphery’s speed. The question is whether their competitiveness is improving. Labour cost and trade figures don’t suggest it is – at least not yet.

France’s economy grew by 0.2 percent in the fourth quarter; Germany contracted by 0.2 percent. In each case their speed was better than expected. Mild weather, which favours construction, may have helped. But certainly Germany’s resilience was due to more than that. The German ZEW business confidence survey leaped in February to its highest level since May. U.S. demand is picking up. Germany may surprise positively by growing in the first quarter.

But because Germany is heavily export-dependent it does not do much to pull its neighbours along. So the periphery is dropping further back. The Portuguese economy contracted by 1.3 percent in the fourth quarter, Italy by 0.7 percent, Greece by a staggering 7 percent year-on-year.

Are cuts and reforms making these economies fitter? The answer may be yes in Ireland, which cut its labour costs by 1.1 percent year-on-year in the third quarter. Portugal’s rose by only 0.8 percent. But labour costs in Spain rose by 3.9 percent – compared to rises of 2.9 percent in Germany and 3.1 percent in France – and Italy’s by 2.2 percent, only a little better than in the core. Belated reforms in Spain and Italy need to make a material difference.

The competitiveness problem is also evident in the periphery’s trade numbers. Recession normally slashes deficits by reducing imports. But Greece was still running an over 8 percent of GDP deficit on current account late in 2011, Portugal’s deficit exceeds 7 percent of GDP and those of Spain and Italy exceed 3 percent. Only Ireland has joined strong core countries like Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium and Austria by moving into trade surplus.

It isn’t just debt that matters. Growth and competitiveness are the key to keeping the periphery in the race. At present the stragglers aren’t offering much to cheer.

Comments

Perhaps we are witnessing the de facto separation of the trade surplus Euro1 bloc (Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and Ireland) from the trade deficit Euro2 bloc (all the rest including Greece). Like that Greece would not be so isolated and contagion would not precipitate a domino effect because the whole Euro2 bloc would stand together and support each other. Rather Euro2 would be floated independently of Euro1. It could be at a variable rate to the Euro1 or periodically fixed as is the Swiss franc. Both blocs should be open to easy entry and exit with democratically controlled conditions and procedures for both. Like that the whole european economy would be stable and in control rather than the present vulnerable (deliberately so?) mess.

Posted by Nemesis4all | Report as abusive
 

It is highly misleading to speak of “core” and “periphery” when the competitiveness divide is actually one of south/north. Take Estonia or Finland, for example.

Posted by Tierala | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/