<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPS could be bidding against itself for TNT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/02/22/ups-could-be-bidding-against-itself-for-tnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/02/22/ups-could-be-bidding-against-itself-for-tnt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RachaelHolland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/02/22/ups-could-be-bidding-against-itself-for-tnt/comment-page-1/#comment-8890</link>
		<dc:creator>RachaelHolland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=9594#comment-8890</guid>
		<description>A shame TNT seems to be approaching a possible merger from a $ offer only orientation.  Historically, UPS has the lowest-cost operations..due to lower investment in employees, facilities, equipment..and will likely lay-off a significant number of TNT employees.  

Conversely, FedEx operates from a strategic investment orientation with the goal of growing sales and jobs.  Big picture:  an international supply chain gateway leveraging Schiphol/TNT, FedEx Super hub, and 1-2 other geographic spots.  

Lastly, on shareholder value, the UPS bid resulted in a 60% increase (on just offer, not deal) in stock prices - which on a stock-based acquisition - could translate into significant cash to fund investment in international markets - if the companies hold a significant portion of their own stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shame TNT seems to be approaching a possible merger from a $ offer only orientation.  Historically, UPS has the lowest-cost operations..due to lower investment in employees, facilities, equipment..and will likely lay-off a significant number of TNT employees.  </p>
<p>Conversely, FedEx operates from a strategic investment orientation with the goal of growing sales and jobs.  Big picture:  an international supply chain gateway leveraging Schiphol/TNT, FedEx Super hub, and 1-2 other geographic spots.  </p>
<p>Lastly, on shareholder value, the UPS bid resulted in a 60% increase (on just offer, not deal) in stock prices &#8211; which on a stock-based acquisition &#8211; could translate into significant cash to fund investment in international markets &#8211; if the companies hold a significant portion of their own stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
