“Buy China” auto drive not just protectionism

By Wei Gu
February 29, 2012

By Wei Gu

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

Chinese bureaucrats’ love affair with the Audi may soon come to an end. Beijing’s new list of foreign car brands for government procurement contains not one foreign supplier. That may be a response to huge overproduction by local firms, and foreign rivals may read it as foul play. But the real lesson is that when growth slows, domestic concerns seem more important than keeping trade partners, or Audi-driving officials, happy.

Car sales have been dragged lower as the economy has cooled. Difficulties in getting licence plates in big cities like Beijing have played a part too. January’s volume of cars sold was 24 percent lower than a year earlier, the biggest monthly drop in more than three years. Yet production continues. China had 6 million units’ worth of unutilised capacity in 2011, equivalent to 40 percent of last year’s domestic sales.

The new policy will help a bit, especially by boosting smaller players like BYD and Geely. BYD sold 14 percent fewer vehicles in 2011 than a year earlier; Dongfeng’s own brand car sales fell by 6 percent, even as the number of imported Audis almost doubled. Not all Chinese suppliers will be thrilled, since foreign joint ventures such as Shanghai Automotive’s tie-up with General Motors, are not on the list either.

But the change may say more about political sensitivity than protectionism. The auto industry is a big employer. China is Audi’s biggest market thanks to bureaucrats’ fondness for the German car, but the siren-toting black sedans have become a symbol for unbridled power and privilege. Finally, there’s public spending: as much as half of government expenses go on automobiles, according to the National Audit Office.

The policy looks like an unwelcome return to the controversial “Buy China” policy introduced for government procurement in 2009, and it follows a string of incidents that have rattled foreign companies, including Apple’s iPad trademark fight, and export restrictions on rare earth. But it shouldn’t be a surprise. When faced with a choice between foreign and domestic concerns, China usually opts for the latter.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

“When faced with a choice between foreign and domestic concerns, China usually opts for the latter.”

Is this specific to China?

When Americans buy Chinese goods, is it because they have concerns for China?

Posted by garilou | Report as abusive