Amazon hedges against the rise of the machines

March 20, 2012

By Robert Cyran
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Is Amazon hedging itself against the rise of the machines? That’s one way to explain the kooky $775 million purchase of Kiva Systems. Either that or the online retailing giant’s founder Jeff Bezos has a robot fetish. It’s not clear what the deal offers Amazon shareholders. Automating Amazon’s warehouses makes sense. But buying Kiva droids, rather than their maker, seems the more rational approach.

There’s no doubt that Kiva’s orange robots have a big place in the future of supply chains. And after the initial outlay of $15 million for a giant warehouse, throwing in a few Kiva borgs helps to slash operating costs and speed the handling of goods. This explains why Kiva is growing roughly 80 percent annually, with sales approaching $150 million last year according to analysts.

Amazon undoubtedly needs some help – the company’s net margin was less than 2 percent last year as fulfillment costs rose 58 percent. Automation helps reduce these costs. Fewer workers need to be hired and items can be shipped faster, which means items can be sent by truck rather than pricier planes. It may also increase capital efficiency if warehouses can handle more items or inventory turnover quickens.

Yet it’s not obvious that Amazon needed to buy the cow when it could just purchase the milk. Kiva already sells lots of robots to companies ranging from Gap to Staples. For $775 million, Amazon could buy a lot of robots without the hassle of running a company that’s peripheral to its core business of selling apparel, books, music or toys. Instead, it’s paying five times estimated sales for what looks like a distraction.

There may be a strategic advantage to Amazon owning Kiva. While the company says it will continue to sell its robots to other firms, there may be ways to tailor the systems to fit best with Amazon’s warehouses and systems, giving it a leg up on online retailing rivals. But Kiva has plenty of rivals trying to build better robots that would gladly fill any void in the market. The machines may one day rise, but there’s no assurance Amazon’s pricy bet will.

Comments

I agree that it’s difficult to justify an acquisition in which you either take on the task of supplying your competitors or pay for revenue that you’ll never realize. In this case though I think strategic concerns about a particular competitor, eBay, may help justify the acquisition.

With it’s purchase of GSI Commerce & a number of smaller companies over the last few years eBay has made a clear move into the e-commerce logistics space. With those additions eBay is one of the few companies that can rival Amazon’s ability to supply an end to end e-commerce infrastructure stack (web infrastructure, billing, and fulfillment).

Amazon obviously has a long competitive history with fellow e-commerce giant eBay, but it has also squared off against GSI a number of times. Following a public blowup in 2005 Toys R Us defected from Amazon’s fulfillment and storefront services to GSI commerce.
GSI also offers a direct competitor to Amazon Prime, dubbed Shoprunner, for customers at the web storefronts that it operates.

With this purchase Amazon could choose to deny eBay access to Kiva’s innovative technology, potentially damaging eBay’s ability to offer competitive rates for its 3rd party e-commerce services & Shoprunner.

Posted by andremp | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/