Hong Kong’s LME bid is big bet on China flows

By Wei Gu
May 10, 2012

By Wei Gu

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

Hong Kong is playing the China card in the bidding for the London Metal Exchange. Proximity to the world’s largest consumer of metals might make up for the Hong Kong Exchange’s relative inexperience in trading commodities. But Beijing may open up regardless of who owns the LME.

For Hong Kong, the bid is a bold attempt to move beyond its main business of trading and clearing equities. A robust flow of listings from the mainland, and less intense price competition than that facing its rivals in the West, have made Hong Kong the world’s second-largest exchange by market value, behind CME Group. But the flow of new issues from China may have peaked. The LME could drive a new revenue boost.

There’s no question that China is under-represented on the LME. Though the country consumes 40 percent of the world’s metals, China-related trading is estimated to account for just 20 percent of LME volumes. If China-related ownership had helped lift that figure to, say, 30 percent, the LME’s 2010 revenue would have been boosted by roughly 10 percent.

Such a shift is largely in Beijing’s gift. The LME currently has just one Chinese member and a handful of companies which do business through other members, as Beijing restricts domestic firms from trading on foreign exchanges. Greater Chinese participation would also favour current LME members such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, which make money from trading, financing and other services.

Hong Kong often stands first in the line when China opens up. But it’s unclear that the door for the LME will open faster under Hong Kong ownership. Chinese authorities are concerned that local firms’ risk controls aren’t up to global standards, after a few high-profile trading losses. They also want to give time for the Shanghai Futures Exchange to develop before allowing LME’s warehouses in.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s lack of metals experience counts against it. Rival bidders such as CME Group, NYSE Euronext and InterContinental Exchange, are better positioned to cut costs and modernize the 130-year-old exchange. Boosting volumes from China may trump such considerations. But Hong Kong still has to prove the China card is its to play.

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/