Graff Diamonds IPO gleams but doesn’t dazzle

May 21, 2012

By John Foley

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

It’s hard to think of a company more plugged into the 0.1 percent than Graff Diamonds. The UK diamond merchant, which in 2011 sold rocks worth almost $100 million to a single customer, plans to list its shares in Hong Kong, in an offering that could raise $1 billion and value the whole at $4 billion. Strip out the hype over the ascent of the super-rich, and the valuation looks solid if not a steal.

The business model is pure plutocracy. Around half of Graff’s revenue in 2011 came from pieces worth more than $1 million. Whereas the likes of LVMH or Prada rely on expanding wealth, Graff can benefit simply from growing inequality. That helps explain its 25 percent revenue growth over the past three years.

Against that, investors have to weigh unusual risks. Sales could prove lumpy, since Graff gets around half of its revenue from just 20 customers. Billionaires, especially in Asia, can fall from grace alarmingly fast. There’s also the risk of false confidence. The super-rich are often touted as shock-proof spenders, but that was proven wrong in 2009, when Graff’s sales fell by 25 percent.

To see what Graff is worth, split it in two. First, there’s a super-high-end retailer. If Graff can expand last year’s $624 million of retail revenue by 15 percent, and sustain its current 20 percent margin, it could make $165 million in retail operating profit by 2013. Pop that conservatively on the 10 times multiple that LVMH commands and it’s worth $1.7 billion.

But Graff has another asset – its remarkable $880 million inventory of rocks, valued at cost, and mostly bought when prices were lower. Assume a market value twice as high, in line with the increase in high-grade diamond prices over the past five years, and these could be worth $2 billion. Combine the two parts, and $3-4 billion looks like a fair price.

What remains to be seen is how Graff will handle public life. It’s likely that the Graff family, which is selling down just under a quarter of its stake, has a plan, though is staying mum about what. Ramping up store numbers and that inventory seems certain; and its clean balance sheet means big acquisitions are likely. Hopefully the Graffs won’t forget that in the diamond business, value comes from the illusion of scarcity.

Comments

My concern about putting my clients assets to work in Graff is I am certain the not all 20 customers represent 5% of the revenue to equal 100% (the total). My concern with this particular segment is that if 2 or 3 of the 20 customers may represent 40 % or more of the revenue in this segment- how do we know? And if our living large Russian and Chinese friends really take it on the chin- they are less likely than US top 1% to continue to buy high end regardless-their culture is not the same. Russias wealth is so extremely consentrated in oil, that any pain felt in this area and ” Boris” will be drinkning vodka all day in his new 1 bedroom flat. I think the Graffs MUST expand and market to wealthy customers and bsuiness segments that have very diversified means of wealth creation. Do you agree?
YES, millionaires I said- NOT billionaires, most likely make up the VAST majority of the extreme high end diamond customer base- example: BMW’s, Mercedes, R. Royce, higher end Yachts, etc. – it’s perception. Multi- millionaires or ( less) will find a way to buy the items they can’t quite afford and feel they are entitled too these “riches” I see it in my financial practice every day- it’s human nature and numbers support this claim to show they can buy the “best” for their wife and loved ones- Perception is reality and diamonds will always make the cut ( pun intended)
” A diamond can cut glass, and create the perception of class”… Please respond if you can feel you can add anything, much appreciated! – Perino :)

Posted by perino125 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/