<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graff Diamonds IPO gleams but doesn&#8217;t dazzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/05/21/graff-diamonds-ipo-gleams-but-doesnt-dazzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/05/21/graff-diamonds-ipo-gleams-but-doesnt-dazzle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: perino125</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2012/05/21/graff-diamonds-ipo-gleams-but-doesnt-dazzle/comment-page-1/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator>perino125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/?p=11596#comment-9308</guid>
		<description>My concern about putting my clients assets to work in Graff is I am certain the not all 20 customers represent 5% of the  revenue to equal 100% (the total).  My concern with this particular segment is that if 2 or 3 of the 20 customers may represent 40 % or more  of the revenue in this segment- how do we know? And if our living large Russian and Chinese friends really take it on the chin- they are less likely than US top 1% to continue to buy high end regardless-their culture is not the same.  Russias wealth is so extremely consentrated in oil, that any pain felt in this area and &quot; Boris&quot; will be drinkning vodka all day in his new 1 bedroom flat.  I think the Graffs MUST expand and market to wealthy customers and bsuiness segments that have very diversified means of wealth creation. Do you agree?
 YES, millionaires I said- NOT billionaires, most likely make up the VAST majority of the extreme high end diamond customer base- example: BMW&#039;s, Mercedes, R. Royce, higher end Yachts, etc. - it&#039;s perception. Multi- millionaires or ( less) will find a way to buy the items they can&#039;t quite afford and feel they are entitled too these &quot;riches&quot; I see it in my financial practice every day- it&#039;s human nature and numbers support this claim to show they can buy the &quot;best&quot; for their wife and loved ones- Perception is reality and diamonds will always make the cut ( pun intended)
&quot; A diamond can cut glass, and create the perception of class&quot;...  Please respond if you can  feel you can add anything, much appreciated!   - Perino  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern about putting my clients assets to work in Graff is I am certain the not all 20 customers represent 5% of the  revenue to equal 100% (the total).  My concern with this particular segment is that if 2 or 3 of the 20 customers may represent 40 % or more  of the revenue in this segment- how do we know? And if our living large Russian and Chinese friends really take it on the chin- they are less likely than US top 1% to continue to buy high end regardless-their culture is not the same.  Russias wealth is so extremely consentrated in oil, that any pain felt in this area and &#8221; Boris&#8221; will be drinkning vodka all day in his new 1 bedroom flat.  I think the Graffs MUST expand and market to wealthy customers and bsuiness segments that have very diversified means of wealth creation. Do you agree?<br />
 YES, millionaires I said- NOT billionaires, most likely make up the VAST majority of the extreme high end diamond customer base- example: BMW&#8217;s, Mercedes, R. Royce, higher end Yachts, etc. &#8211; it&#8217;s perception. Multi- millionaires or ( less) will find a way to buy the items they can&#8217;t quite afford and feel they are entitled too these &#8220;riches&#8221; I see it in my financial practice every day- it&#8217;s human nature and numbers support this claim to show they can buy the &#8220;best&#8221; for their wife and loved ones- Perception is reality and diamonds will always make the cut ( pun intended)<br />
&#8221; A diamond can cut glass, and create the perception of class&#8221;&#8230;  Please respond if you can  feel you can add anything, much appreciated!   &#8211; Perino  <img src='http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
