BoE can’t blame Europe for its monetary U-turn
By Peter Thal Larsen
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Reality is catching up with Mervyn King once again. After months of resistance, the governor of the Bank of England has announced plans to channel subsidised loans to British borrowers and pump extra liquidity into banks. The overt justification for the U-turn is to pre-empt a storm from Europe. But King canāt lay all the blame on the euro zone: many of Britainās woes are self-inflicted.
The central bank has slashed interest rates and pumped 325 billion pounds into the economy through quantitative easing. Yet bank funding costs remain high and credit tight. This is particularly painful for consumers and small businesses, which have few alternatives to bank finance.
So the BoE is to offer banks up to 80 billion pounds in multi-year loans at below-market rates, secured against loans to the British economy. Not for the first time, the government will indemnify the central bank against subsequent losses. The BoE will also conduct monthly auctions of six-month liquidity to ease funding strains.
Without the hard details, itās hard to say whether the āfunding-for-lendingā initiative will work. But it will test the view of many bank executives that falling lending reflects a shortage of demand, not a lack of supply. Extra liquidity is of course welcome, even though the size and duration of the BoEās programme falls well short of the European Central Bankās operations.
King is wrong to blame problems entirely on the euro zone. Though turmoil on the continent has undermined economic confidence and rattled markets, government austerity and the UKās still-large private debt burden are an added drag. Regulation hasnāt helped either: Kingās plan for taxpayer-subsidised loans coincided with the government publishing new rules designed to limit future bailouts. Though the reforms make long-term sense, they will hardly make bank credit cheaper.
The UK authorities are recognising that loose monetary policy wonāt work if the banking system isnāt functioning properly. And the emphasis of policymaking is rightly moving beyond financial stability: the BoEās new Financial Policy Committee, originally set up to prevent future asset bubbles, will be given an explicit mandate to promote economic growth. But itās disingenuous to suggest the euro zone forced the change of direction.