U.S. senators show manipulation double standards

July 17, 2012

By Martin Hutchinson
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Not for the first time, there are double standards on display in the U.S. Senate. During Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s testimony on Tuesday, lawmakers loudly denounced bank skullduggery to fix Libor rates. Then came demands for Fed action to create U.S. jobs. The latter is at least clearly legal, but it’s still manipulation – and it has far more potential to damage markets for the long term.

Barclays traders’ false London Interbank Offered Rate quotes represented both profit-maximization by traders and institutional attempts to improve the market perception of Barclays by lowering one proxy for its cost of funds. The senators missed this distinction. It matters because the second rationale for dodgy Libor quotes, condoned by UK authorities by some accounts, is a step toward the policy intervention some senators are so keen on.

And it is consistent with the deliberate manipulation that central bankers in the United States, the UK and elsewhere have been undertaking since the crisis erupted, if not before. This has involved many tactics, from direct purchases of government and mortgage bonds by the Fed, to simply maintaining short-term interest rates near zero, far below the level of inflation, as Bernanke’s Fed has done. On Tuesday he seemed ready to try more such interventions if U.S. economic growth remains weak.

While Libor ostensibly governs aspects of $500 trillion or more of derivatives contracts, it has proved hard so far to identify major market consequences of the false quotes submitted – though they could emerge. Action by central banks like the Fed, by contrast, has artificially reduced borrowing rates for governments including the United States that owe trillions of dollars and pushed down the cost of U.S. mortgages, for example. At the same time it has made safe returns hard to come by for pension funds and other investors. It’s no coincidence that S&P Dow Jones Indices reckons companies in the S&P 500 Index face record underfunding of their pensions and other retirement benefits.

These consequences, extending over the whole economy for several years, surely far exceed the impact of a few spivvy Libor traders. The argument for Fed intervention carried weight for many in the heat of the crisis. But to help the economy return to a healthier, less distorted state, the senators would now do well to complain as vigorously about further official market rigging as they do about the unofficial variety.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Bernanke’s interventions are of no significance

In a decaying Society Art if it is truthful
Must also reflect decay
And unless it wants to break faith with its social function
Art must show the world as changeable
And help to change it

View this film


Change is unavoidable, because the system itself is exhausting our planet’s resources eliminating its ability being able to support life and poverty is killing more people than all the wars combined.

The system is dependent upon consumption which industrialization is eliminating because it is eliminating labor in manufacturing and housing , which consequently is eliminating the ability to consume because ti is eliminating wages. The system is self destructive because it keeps printing money to support consumption thereby causing inflation . The system wastes natural resources by manufacturing planned obsolescence, creating vast garbage dumps of valuable metals and minerals. We will run out of natural resources if we do not change the system

Now how do we get the 1% to give up their power, so the entire planet can be provided for in a manner that conserves limited resources

Posted by drpalms | Report as abusive