India begins the post-Mukherjee clear-up

August 9, 2012

By Jeff Glekin

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Pranab Mukherjee’s reign as Indian finance minister was stained by economic meddling and political favouritism. Now he is gone, and some of his excesses are being reversed. An enemy has been pardoned and a friend has not received a plum job. This could be the beginning of a better era.

Imagine if Tim Geithner had been accused of putting pressure on the securities regulator to protect some political friends. The U.S. Treasury Secretary would be in serious hot water. But when the former number two at the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) accused Mukherjee of something similar – putting pressure on the SEBI chairman to “manage” some high-profile corporate cases – there was little attention.

Rather, in a move that was all too typical of the Mukherjee regime, the finance ministry countered with allegations against the whistle-blower, K.M. Abraham. But the post-Mukherjee government is different. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has cleared Abraham.

In another development, the board of UTI, Asia’s oldest asset management company, is set to appoint a new chief executive. The position has been vacant for the past year and a half as the finance minister put pressure on the company, 26 percent owned by U.S. fund manager T. Rowe Price, to appoint the brother of one of Mukherjee’s most powerful advisors. The former political favourite, Jitesh Khosla, hasn’t made the new shortlist.

India’s new finance minister, P. Chidambaram, is also shaking up his own team. On Sunday he announced that the top officials in the revenue and expenditure departments would swap jobs. That seems to be a signal of a shift in the tax department’s priorities. It might pave the way for a reversal of Mukherjee’s damaging retrospective tax grabs.

Economists have been cutting their forecasts of India’s 2013 GDP growth to well below 6 percent. Part of the slowdown can be traced back to industrialists’ and investors’ mistrust of the finance ministry. With Mukherjee gone, some serious work can now get done. The initial cleaning of the political mess is relatively easy. The removal of the economic mire will take longer and be much harder.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

I wonder what would be thoughts of an Indian reading the article 50 years down the line.

The present moral standards of the ruling allinace and policiital class is setting new standards of degradation. Ostensibily, it you have a yes man as head of UTI, it would be convenient to help a few friends in industry, securities market.

To cap it all we appoint the gentleman in question President of India.

Posted by IndiaPost | Report as abusive

Blaming everything that is wrong with the management of Indian Economy to the then Finance Minister, aka Pranab Mukherjee, appears an easier way out of the responsibility by those who [ought to]matter in the Government.
If whatever is being claimed incorrect or as the wrong-doings is [or was] true, what prevented from taking on the steps to correct them?
In my view, the matter is not simply of a FDI retail here or a Diesel price hike there or GAAR deferment elsewhere.
What needs to be done is to ensure that every pie that the government spends is not frittered away to the pockets of the unscrupulous class, every economic decision be taken on solely the basis of its long-term merit of what IS GOOD for the country etc. And this applies to all the state governments and local bodies as well.
Are we talking of utopia?

Posted by Ashok_Vaishnav | Report as abusive