Maybe Jamie Dimon wasn’t so clever with Bear

October 2, 2012

By Antony Currie

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Maybe Jamie Dimon wasn’t so clever with Bear Stearns after all. Back in March 2008, the JPMorgan chief executive looked pretty shrewd picking up the collapsed investment bank on the cheap, even after raising his offer five-fold to $10 a share. Dimon stuffed the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with $29 billion of Bear’s worst-looking mortgage assets. Not only did those securities wind up making money, but a new lawsuit filed by New York’s top lawman shows that JPMorgan didn’t cover all its bases.

Bear’s home loan-backed assets were in the red for a while at the New York Fed. Inside JPMorgan, which retained only the first $1 billion of losses, they might have damaged Dimon’s fortress balance sheet during the darkest days of the crisis. They did eventually turn a profit for the central bank, as Dimon had suggested they could. But that took almost four years.

The legal liabilities of buying Bear Stearns won’t go away, though. That was to some extent expected – and JPMorgan set aside a chunk of money to cover such costs. It has already settled a number of Bear-related claims, relating to both mortgages and auction-rate securities.

Those were manageable, though others are pending. The latest case, a civil suit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on Monday, could dwarf expectations. The allegations – the first to originate from the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group established by President Barack Obama – claim Bear systematically abandoned underwriting guidelines and that management failed to act when it was brought to their attention.

The result is that investors allegedly lost $22.5 billion, or roughly a quarter of the face value of more than 100 mortgage bonds the defunct bank structured and sold in 2006 and 2007 before Dimon’s bank bought it. JPMorgan argues they are “recycled claims already made by private plaintiffs.”

There are also suggestions that Schneiderman may have jumped the gun. Two government officials in Washington told Reuters that most of the investigation was carried out at the federal level. Even so, if this latest attempt to punish Wall Street for mortgage abuses succeeds, Dimon will be left wishing he’d been tougher still when negotiating with U.S. authorities.

Comments

Blindsiding I-Bank schmucks always puts a smile on my face. Occupy Wall Street deserves a raise for this.

Posted by hoxfan | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/