Last U.S. debate neglects foreign policy realities

October 23, 2012

By Jeffrey Goldfarb
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The last U.S. presidential debate was an oratorical rendition of Saul Steinberg’s 1976 illustration of the myopic world view from New York. Listening to Barack Obama and Mitt Romney spar on Monday night, it would have been easy to forget Europe exists and imagine the Middle East is as big as the African continent and Asia combined. Free trade got short shrift and the global coordination of finance nary a mention. Worse, politically facile China-bashing suggests both men may miss a big opportunity.

Israel, Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan couldn’t be ignored and weren’t. Combined, they were mentioned at least 125 times during the 90-minute event, according to a transcript published by the New York Times. But Europe, whose fiscal crisis is still weighing on global economic growth, was discussed once, by the president, and only in the context of military cooperation. Germany, Italy and Spain never came up. Romney invoked Greece – as a bad word.

Neither candidate saw fit to acknowledge the importance of worldwide unity on economic matters. America’s looming fiscal cliff and ongoing European bailouts are proving to be significant drags on demand, and consequently impeding the emergence of developing nations. The cumulative impact of so many national austerity measures represents a significant danger. Neither candidate seems to appreciate the repercussions.

On the matter of trade, only China really mattered in Boca Raton, Florida. Romney recognized opportunities in Latin America, but lack of agreements to expand trade with the European Union, Japan and high-growth countries like Indonesia escaped his radar. It was a curious omission after Republicans spent so much time criticizing the president’s delay in pushing through deals with Colombia and South Korea.

Instead, Obama touted the record number of cases he has brought against China for violating trade rules and Romney promised to label the Middle Kingdom a currency manipulator on his first day in office. The show of strength may play well in Peoria, but overlooks a political event as big, if not bigger, than the U.S. election.

China’s upcoming handover of power offers America a golden opportunity to make progress on matters of market liberalization, financial services and intellectual property with the world’s second-biggest economy. The topic was the most disappointing omission of many from the foreign policy debate and all too indicative of the distorted perspective of the world from those who would survey it from the White House.

Comments

I appreciate your frustrations. You forgot two major issues, both closely related to the US foreign policy, perhaps, the international relations.

Energy
Climate Change.

On my personal blog, I wrote about “Foggy Bottom” bottomless pit, where nothing ever makes sense. That is because, like higher differential mathematics formulae, it gets too difficult to explain in words that a common man on the Main Street in Peoria, IL could understand.

People are happy with something they can chew, easily. Foreign wars and middle class tax exemptions. The rest, they leave it to a likeable person. The most likeable person, as of today, happens to be Mitt Romney, not Barack Obama.

Take it or leave it, “Show me the money.”

…and I am Sid Harth@gosumercogito.blogspot.com

Posted by SiDhaMama | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/