A Hewlett-Packard primer on how not to do a deal

November 22, 2012

By Richard Beales and Robert Cyran

The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.

If it weren’t so tragic for a once-revered technology pioneer, the story of Hewlett-Packard’s purchase of Autonomy would be a comedy of errors. If nothing else, it’s a case study of what to avoid when tempted to contemplate a big takeover.

Don’t do a giant deal when there’s chaos in the boardroom.
In August 2011 when the all-cash transaction was announced with an $11.7 billion price tag, Leo Apotheker had been HP’s chief executive for less than a year. Despite the revolving door to the corner office since the departure of Carly Fiorina in early 2005, some members of the dysfunctional board hadn’t even met him before he was appointed. He didn’t survive to see the deal completed.

Don’t let a venture capitalist-director call the shots.
Partly because of the instability at the top of executive management, HP board members got unusually involved in the company’s strategy. One who pushed the Autonomy deal was Marc Andreessen, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist. He may be a top-notch ideas guy and know something about starting up companies, but business planning for a mature company doesn’t seem to be his strong point.

Don’t pay a big premium in a hurry.
HP’s purchase of Mike Lynch’s software creation was pegged at a 64 percent premium to Autonomy’s market price. Yet the Silicon Valley giant pushed ahead on a tight schedule, relying heavily on public information. A quick Google search would have shown several analysts and fund managers questioning whether Autonomy’s books were trustworthy. What HP calls accounting improprieties have now contributed to an $8.8 billion writedown. There should at least be a trade-off between the premium – more like 30 percent in a typical M&A deal – and how intensive due diligence can be. Oh, and if you’re going to overpay, try to do it in your own overpriced stock, not in cash.

Listen to your finance chief.
Cathie Lesjak – HP’s chief financial officer, who served as interim CEO before Apotheker showed up – went against her boss’s wishes and made a presentation to the board explaining why Autonomy was too expensive. HP’s writedown isn’t only about accounting problems. The company simply paid too much. It’s harder to listen to abrasive competitors, but Oracle went public after the deal was announced to say that it had looked at Autonomy but found even its then market value of $6 billion too expensive.

Don’t buy a company from Frank Quattrone.
The tech banker and Qatalyst boutique founder is a great salesman, pulling in top dollar selling companies like Motorola Mobility to Google and, of course, Autonomy to HP. But his record suggests that acquirers should think twice – the chances are they are overpaying.

Comments

Fiorina and Apothker are folding and refolding their golden parachutes, so they really could care less about what happens to HP.

Quattrone has several golden parachutes and piles of dust-laden money. The opinions of the authors about Quattrone are the most cogent. Yet, nothing of substance will occur until the next corporate debacle unfolds with more golden parachute departures. This jaded business is an on-going United States saga.

Meanwhile, 50% of all college graduates have no jobs, and they are buried in debt from the student loan racket, and almost 50% of the United States citizens will still have no adequate health-care. The care that Obama is offering will cost the average citizen more than he or she can afford, and medicare without an expensive insurance supplement is useless.

Try to find a physician who will accept medicare without a supplemental package. Next to impossible.

Pay more attention to the average citizens in the United States. The corrupt Corporate Oligarchy will take care of themselves, as they have always done.

In other words:get real.

Posted by decker | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/