UK could raid the rich to boost a poor economy

November 30, 2012

By Ian Campbell

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own

George Osborne has his hands tied. Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer wants to boost a flat economy but he needs to tighten policy to hit his targets and meet his own fiscal rules. He may well be able to square the circle in next week’s Autumn Statement – by taking from the rich and putting money into poorer hands that are eager to spend.

Pension perks are an obvious target. Some of the rules surrounding retirement provision look more like tax planning for the privileged. Osborne has already reduced the annual cap on tax breaks on pension contributions, from 255,000 pounds to 50,000 pounds. He could go further still, to say 40,000, or even 30,000 pounds. Still, neither move would bring in more than 1 billion pounds. To get over that level, Osborne could also cap the sum of money enjoyed tax-free when pensions are drawn. At present 25 percent of a pension pot that can go as high as 1.5 million pounds can be taken tax free on retirement.

High-value homes are another lucrative revenue opportunity. Osborne has so far resisted pressure from the Liberal Democrats, the junior partner in the coalition government, for a “mansion tax”. An alternative would be to reform the current Council Tax on property, which charges the very wealthy little more than it does most Britons, by adding extra charges for the most expensive homes. The two highest Council Tax bands include 939,000 properties. Increasing the annual levy on these by 1,050 pounds would bring the Chancellor another 1 billion pounds.

Such measures could then fund a mini stimulus. Freeing more low earners from tax might increase consumer spending and economic growth. The personal income-tax threshold is already due to rise to 9,205 pounds. Osborne could afford to go further – spending 1.2 billion pounds to up it by 200 pounds. There’d be some change to pay for back-to-work scheme for depressed construction workers.  A billion pounds in accelerated capital spending might generate a bit more growth, without sacrificing austerity.

Osborne’s last budget saw him play Sheriff of Nottingham. This time he should aim for Robin Hood.

Comments

If Osborne wants to put money into poorer hands then he should stipulate that the richer hands spend more money. This could be the basis for a new taxing concept focussed around the problem of moving money out of richer hands. Imagine that instead of raising income taxes on the rich or taxing their properties, we stipulate that they must spend 50% (or 80% or 90%) of their income on taxable purchases. This concept would generate tax revenue. It would move cash out of rich hands. AND it would stimulate the economy.

Posted by Anonymous | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/