CDB highlights China’s dysfunctional finance

January 8, 2013

By John Foley

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

China Development Bank is on a roll. The policy lender raised 1.2 trillion yuan ($193 billion) in net domestic funds in 2012, according to Reuters data. The proceeds funded high-profile foreign takeovers, allowed U.S.-listed Chinese companies to go private, and helped Indian billionaire Anil Ambani refinance bonds. Such activities have less to do with development than with China’s financial dysfunction.

Unlike other big banks, CDB’s funding comes not from deposits but bonds that China’s big lenders have an unofficial mandate to buy. Because their loans are capped, most banks have abundant excess deposits that need to be parked somewhere. CDB’s one-year bonds yield around 50 basis points more than one-year deposits, so banks make money on the trade. CDB also has tremendous influence – chairman Chen Yuan is the son of a revolutionary war hero.

With steady funding and good connections, CDB has effectively grown into two banks. The bulk of its $888 billion loan book funds projects that promote China’s development, often using a kind of vendor financing to help Chinese companies sell products and services overseas, from Ghana to Uzbekistan. That helps China keep employment up, and subsidise favoured industries.

The other part looks more like a carefree corporate financier. CDB helped fund the Hong Kong Exchange’s bid for London Metals Exchange, and financed take-private deals for foreign-listed Chinese companies like online retailer Alibaba.com. CDB also financed the $9.4 billion purchase of a stake in insurer Ping An by a Thai entrepreneur, though may be having second thoughts.

CDB’s doesn’t enjoy cheaper funding than commercial banks. Instead, its main advantage is that it’s not very transparent, and doesn’t have to worry about institutional shareholders. So long as it pays dividends to its government owners, CDB can afford to sacrifice earnings. Its net interest margins of 2 percent are below its main rivals, yet its non-performing loan ratio is half theirs, raising fears that tricky debts are being rolled over.

CDB still performs a valuable development role. It may also be helping riskier borrowers underserved by risk-averse banks and underdeveloped bond markets. But its growth postpones the day that China’s financial system starts allocating credit properly. Meanwhile, every below-market loan is a value transfer from Chinese depositors to CDB’s borrowers. In the name of building China’s global influence, savers are getting short changed.

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/