Bumi debacle teaches some all too basic lessons

February 22, 2013

By Kevin Allison and Quentin Webb

The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.

The debacle at Bumi teaches some lessons which really should not need to be learned. The story of Nat Rothschild’s London-listed cash-shell, turned into an Indonesian coal miner, has tarred everyone involved, given acquisition vehicles a bad name, and damaged the City of London’s reputation. Concrete policy changes may follow, and alleged financial skulduggery could yet produce more fallout. But most of the mess could have been avoided if Rothschild and his backers had followed what should be standard practices for risky investments.

Don’t confuse present impotence with future control.

When Vallar, the cash shell which later became Bumi, was listed, the plan A was for gaining “full ownership” of a business. Instead, it bought a minority stake in Indonesia’s Bumi Resources, and a majority in the smaller Berau Coal Energy. The plan to increase the stake in the first foundered. Rothschild struggled to push through change at Bumi Resources. Both Indonesian firms remained listed and subject to Jakarta rules – only complicating efforts to exercise control over faraway assets. It would have been better to have full control from the outset.

Be sure independent advice is completely independent.

The banks had tangled loyalties and stood to earn far more from doing a large deal than from recommending restraint. Finding and assessing targets, including handling due diligence, was outsourced to Nat Rothschild, who would receive financial rewards for doing a deal, even one that turned out badly. Cash shells want to move fast, and do not typically seek investors’ approval for acquisitions. But a truly independent fairness opinion could have made a difference.

Recognise that bets on commodities are risky.

The price of thermal coal that Bumi mines is down 30 percent since March 2011, when the deal closed. Volatile prices alone would have pounded the coal producer’s shares, even without the spectacular dust-up between Rothschild and his business partners.

Reputations are often exaggerated.

Warren Buffett said: “When a management team with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.” At Bumi, when a cluster of businesses with a reputation for murky governance met a Mayfair club-full of City grandees, it was the former’s reputation that held up.

Disproportionate rewards encourage distorted vision.

Rothschild got cheap bonus shares as a reward for striking a deal. But just buying a company isn’t a measure of success. The cash-shell model is sometimes described as a public version of a private equity fund. But for all the flaws of PE, at least the managers’ rewards take some time – and some signs of economic success – to arrive.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/