Newtown effect yields bumper crop for gunsmiths

March 6, 2013

By Robert Cyran
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

The “Connecticut effect” is yielding a bumper crop for gunsmiths. Smith & Wesson’s order backlog hit an all-time high following the Dec. 14 shootings of 20 first-graders and six teachers in Newtown, Connecticut. The company raised sales projections for the third time in a year. The prospect of tighter gun restrictions – however remote politically – has buyers in a panic. The National Rifle Association has earned its keep for another quarter.

Sales at the Springfield, Massachusetts-based firm rose nearly 40 percent and income more than tripled. And the maker of such weapons as the M&P 15 Sport semiautomatic with a 30-round magazine thinks the good times will continue. So do its shareholders: the stock is up 16 percent this year.

Demand for firearms took off early last year as the NRA took a hard stance against President Barack Obama in his campaign, claiming he was conspiring to gut the Second Amendment. The December school shootings made this wild talk seem real to those with an expansive view of the right to bear arms. In January, the president called for a ban on some military-style assault rifles, limits on magazine capacities and background checks on all gun sales.

Other companies have also enjoyed the frenzy. Firearms maker Sturm, Ruger’s stock has gained a quarter so far this year. Wal-Mart had to ration ammunition sales. Hunting-goods store Cabela’s has added $850 million of market value since the start of 2013. Yet the industry knows that Sandy Hook has changed the gun debate. The school shooting dominated Smith & Wesson’s conference call with investors. Smith & Wesson’s boss began the call by “sending our thoughts and prayers to those affected.”

In addition to planned bills on gun trafficking and background checks, polls show a large segment of the American voters favor restrictions on magazines and assault weapons. New York, California and Connecticut – the state that brought the world the Colt 45 – are tightening up rules. State pension funds are withdrawing investment from firearms makers.

But markets have their own self-correcting mechanism, too. Smith & Wesson’s backlog of $688 million has tripled over the past year amid fears guns will be banned. That’s not likely to happen and eventually supply will catch up with demand. In 2009, when the last gun bubble collapsed, the company’s backlog fell by about two-thirds in six months as confiscatory worries receded. It may not satisfy gun reformers, but the current buying fever will subside of its own accord.

Comments

The author seems to have a handle on the business aspects involved but cannot contain his disdain for those who enjoy all the different aspects of firearms ownership.

Mr. Cryan, if you get a chance to get out of New York I invite you to visit a fish and game club shoot, a firearms museum (D.C. and Cody, WY), to go along on a rabbit hunt. Go to a rural gunshop and ask why the owner loves what he or she does. I invite you to visit the NRA website and drill down to see the legal, historical, judical and social aspects of firearms ownership. There is much more but you’ll have to find it on your own.

Perhaps really, your article should call it the “Democratic effect” since there seems to be a top down call to attack the Second Amendment. Baffling really because the Democrats are trying to position Hillary Clinton. If she is elected then say goodbye to firearms ownership. And the guy on the street…the voter on the street knows this.

Posted by akrozbi | Report as abusive
 

P.S. Not an expansive view, a clear eyed view. See Heller v. DC for excellent reading.

Posted by akrozbi | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/