Fed generates the wealth, but where’s the effect?

May 31, 2013

By Agnes T. Crane

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.

The so-called wealth effect looks overrated. Americans’ private worth grew twice as fast as the U.S. economy last year, according to the Boston Consulting Group, due largely to the rise in stocks and other financial assets. But consumers aren’t rushing to spend their gains.

That contradicts one theory behind the Federal Reserve’s program of bond-buying, or quantitative easing, now in its third act. The idea is that massive bond purchases, currently $85 billion-worth per month, suppress yields and encourage investors to buy riskier assets like stocks and corporate bonds and regular Joes to purchase homes. Then, rising asset prices make everyone feel wealthier and so more willing to spend. Finally, this greater demand for goods and services stokes faster economic growth.

QE has certainly juiced the markets. The S&P 500 Index, for instance, is up 13 percent since the Fed, chaired by Ben Bernanke, announced its latest round of bond buying. And home prices are on the rebound, making many Americans richer, at least on paper. A new BCG study suggests their wealth increased by 8.1 percent last year, while nominal GDP only expanded by 3.5 percent.

Yet one key linkage – the connection between rising asset prices and freer spending – seems to be missing. In April, U.S. consumer spending actually fell 0.2 percent in nominal terms. Though previous months showed at least modest increases, consumers still have reasons to keep their dollars in their wallets. The unemployment rate is still high and home prices, while rising, are well below their pre-crisis peaks. Moreover, paper gains can disappear, as many people learned in 2008.

It’s impossible to know if consumers would be even less inclined to go to the mall if the Fed had done nothing. And it could just be a matter of time before spending accelerates, with U.S. consumer sentiment at its highest level in nearly six years in May, according to the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan survey. Still, five years into quantitative easing, there isn’t much to show in the real economy for expanding the Fed’s balance sheet by $1 trillion. QE is an untested policy, and the non-appearance of the wealth effect is another reason to wonder whether it’s the right one.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/