EU bonus-cap vote puts fund managers in hot seat

July 3, 2013

By Robert Cole
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are his own.

 

European fund managers can heave a sigh of relief. On Wednesday the European Parliament rejected the plan of Sven Giegold, the German MEP, to place strict limits on bonus payments and to outlaw some performance fees.

Legislators are right to butt out. Fund management houses are private, self-sustaining enterprises. Unlike banks, they don’t need state-funded rescues when they fail. They should be left to agree on pay schemes with their customers.

Much of Giegold’s thinking, however, is valid. Carelessly constructed bonus schemes may encourage senseless risk taking. And mediocre fund managers can get super-charged pay packages simply for riding market upswings.

Fund management houses complain that bonus caps force up salaries and reduce flexibility. But greater pay certainty might be a good thing, aligning the interests of managers and clients. After all, this industry is supposed to offer good service and keep a long-term perspective. Rewards for short-term performance tend to discourage paying attention to the clients, and to penalise cautious managers, who may have served clients well by reducing the risk of losses.

Wednesday’s vote may not be the last word. The regulations for so-called “UCITS” funds, which can be sold over the whole EU, might be changed to include some Giegoldian limits. Fund managers for 6.3 trillion euros of assets may well be obliged to award bonuses based on multi-year performance statistics, and to defer payments to ease possible clawbacks for performance that subsequently proved illusory.

If fund management houses want to keep most of their pay freedom, they should embrace reform. Some of the best operators have already started. Laggards may find that clients, if not European lawmakers, will make them play catch-up.

Comments

Of course such funds can, and should, be limited.

They all operate with pieces of government approved paper atesting “ownership” (that is government recognition and nothing more) of assets, either “equity” or financial. Declare such title null and void if held by non-qualifying organizations and assign ownership to the State. After all, the greatest power is the power to control the playing field!

Do not follow the rules? You may not play the game.

Posted by usagadfly | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/