“Fab” Tourre verdict can only make SEC look bad

July 30, 2013

By Reynolds Holding
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

 

Any verdict in the trial of Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre can only make the Securities and Exchange Commission look bad. Lawyers for the former Goldman Sachs banker seem sure the U.S. regulator has blown it. But even a win would only highlight the watchdog’s failure to bag a high-level bank boss.

The SEC aimed to prove that Tourre, rather than boneheaded bets, caused investor losses of about $1 billion on a collateralized debt obligation called Abacus. Evidence suggested he obscured hedge fund manager John Paulson’s role in picking the securities underlying the Abacus deal and then betting against it. But CDOs of this type only work when someone takes the short side of the transaction. And sophisticated investors like ACA Capital and German bank IKB should have focused on their own investment decisions, not relied on someone else’s.

Flubs by the SEC have made its task more difficult. One top witness, a Paulson lieutenant, swore that he told ACA his boss had shorted the deal. Tourre’s supervisor also unexpectedly disputed the SEC’s explanation for IKB’s investment. And technical jargon may have so thoroughly confused jurors that they’ll conclude the regulator failed to meet its burden of proof.

That’s what Tourre’s lawyers are banking on, having declined to call any witnesses on his behalf. The strategy may backfire, but with the SEC facing only a civil standard of proof rather than a tougher criminal one, they must feel pretty confident.

If the regulator does prevail, however, it still won’t escape criticism. In a trial last August involving a Citigroup CDO, the SEC also went after a mid-level banker. Jurors refused to find him liable, saying they considered him a scapegoat for appalling behavior on a wider scale. The public may see Tourre in a similar light, even if the verdict goes against him.

The SEC deserves credit for pursuing more than 150 firms and individuals over events that occurred during the 2008 financial crisis. Prosecutors like Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara have largely shunned those cases in favor of headline-grabbing insider trading convictions.

But it’s Bharara who is being celebrated as the new sheriff of Wall Street. If the SEC wants a reputation as a watchdog with bite, it needs to start bringing stronger cases against more senior bankers.

 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/