2008 retold: EU bank bail-in saves taxpayer bacon
By George Hay and Neil Unmack
The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.
Lehman as it might have been ā¦Ā The following Ā is part of a special feature package marking the fifth anniversary of the collapse of the Wall Street securities firm. Breakingviews writers imagine what might have happened if post-crisis reformers had acted pre-crisis. Herewith a column Ā from that alternative archive.
Brussels – Monday Sept. 15, 2008
Three cheers for Northern Rock. When the ropey UK lender collapsed last fall, European regulators took one look at their similarly wholesale funding-dependent banking sector and had a collective heart attack. Following Lehman Brothersā mega bail-in at the weekend, it is clear āNorthern Wreckā did European supervisors a huge favour. Without it, they might not have set aside their national differences and created a proper bail-in mechanism of their own.
Over the weekend, the European Unionās Orderly Modification of Financial Groups directive had its first outing. The OMFG, signed in Brussels in July, gave European governments the ability to enforce losses on up to 8 percent of bank liabilities, or 20 percent of risk-weighted assets. It also instantly gave the European Central Bank the power to regulate the 200 biggest banks in the 17-state euro zone, and flag problems to a Single Resolution Mechanism consisting of the European Commission and national regulators.
These lightning-quick reforms, hitherto unheard of in the usually tribal EU, appear to have done the trick. The SRM and the Bank of England, which regulates UK banks that arenāt in the euro zone, went to work as soon as Lehmanās regulators flagged a $25 billion loss from writedowns of subprime gunk. Marking assets to market produced billions of euros of new losses at Europeās biggest banks. Their shareholders have been wiped out, and replaced by converting their stocks of junior debt into equity – 8 percent of risk-weighted assets in the case of Royal Bank of Scotland, 6 percent for Commerzbank, and 4 percent at Lloyds and KBC. Most banks should be able to stay well within the 20 percent limit.
Thatās the good news. Unfortunately, bailing in 250 billion euros of institutional and retail investorsā assets will have practical side effects. Credit demand will slump because everyone who was a bank shareholder will suddenly feel poorer. And insurers and pension funds who invested in bank hybrid debt are now facing steep losses. Some insurers are rushing out emergency rights issues.
A number of money market funds were also exposed to mortgages and other assets the banks have since written down, and are seeing their net asset values plummet as redemptions accelerate. The central role that money market funds play in banksā still gargantuan wholesale funding needs is probably why the ECB has opened the spigots of its emergency liquidity support. An unprecedented three-year longer-term refinancing operation should allow most banks to keep afloat. And guarantees from the euro zoneās new 500 billion euro Fund for Financial Stability should allow banks to roll over their senior debt.
Sure, German politicians are moaning about the moral hazard of having to finance the FFS. They should button it. If the ECB and SRM hadnāt been able to call the shots, each member state would have been incentivised to downplay their banksā problems, which would have left them ill-placed to deal with the inevitable future stresses caused by the euro zoneās decidedly non-optimal currency area. All things considered, Europeās much-maligned regulators have for once got it right.