China plenum is far cry from what might have been
By John Foley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
China‚Äôs third plenum was a study in anti-performance. This meeting of the ruling party‚Äôs top figures traditionally gives each new generation of leaders an opportunity to make big gestures. What emerged on Nov. 12 was only promising policies wrapped up in bland talk. Yet there is an important message: big economic changes may come, but politics remains a matter for Party insiders only.
In the plenum‚Äôs concluding missive, often seen as a blueprint for the next decade, every conceivable reform is mentioned, but with next to no detail. Rule of law, better property rights for peasants, better use of environmental resources and tax reform all make no more than a showing. The introduction of a special working group to oversee reform and the market‚Äôs role being upgraded to ‚Äúdecisive‚ÄĚ are as concrete as it gets.
It‚Äôs a far cry from what might have been. There‚Äôs little sign of the detail hinted at in the recent ‚Äú383 Plan‚ÄĚ, a proposal from an influential think-tank that called for reforms to state-owned enterprises and the services sector.
But vagueness might be the point. After a similar plenum in 1993, party chief Jiang Zemin‚Äôs fuzzy explanation of the ‚Äúsocialist market economy‚ÄĚ confused many observers. Yet under that mantra he pushed through all kinds of non-socialist changes, right up to frog-marching China into the World Trade Organisation.
What‚Äôs clear is that China‚Äôs ruling party has little interest in overhauling the political process. Viewers of the evening news on Nov. 12 were treated to the usual montage of unsmiling men in suits. It couldn‚Äôt be further from the ‚Äúsouthern tour‚ÄĚ of 1992, when Jiang Zemin‚Äôs predecessor, Deng Xiaoping, theatrically hit the road to rally public support for sweeping economic reforms.
And for foreign capitalists, there‚Äôs little to latch on to. No targets for investment; no promises to open up markets such as technology, banking or healthcare to full foreign ownership. The dominance of the ‚Äúpublic sector‚ÄĚ will be maintained. In fact, for all China‚Äôs talk of reform, it‚Äôs as if China‚Äôs leaders aren‚Äôt thinking of outsiders at all. That may be precisely the point.