China fuels optimists, leaves room for pessimists
By John Foley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Chinaās long-awaited blueprint for reform is epic, ambitious, detailed and vague. A sixty-point document issued by the ruling Communist Party on Nov. 15 covers everything from relaxing the hated one-child policy to opening up the financial sector and squeezing more dividends out of state-owned enterprises. Itās enough to restore investorsā faith, if not yet to help them allocate their assets.
The ideological debut of party chief Xi Jinping, a year after he took office, offers a bit of something for almost everyone. Investors get a pledge to accelerate capital account liberalisation. For human rights watchers, there are vows to introduce more deliberative politics, abolish labour camps and be more sparing with the death penalty. Rural dwellers are promised more free migration and trading of land rights.
Financially, previously flagged ideas should become reality. Private financial institutions will be allowed and deposit insurance may finally be introduced. Some service businesses will be opened up to foreign investment, while Shanghaiās new free trade zone may be copied elsewhere. Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are promised more love. And while state-owned enterprises are here to stay, the party hopes private capital can help them become more efficient.
Still, investors have little to latch onto. Instead of firm targets or timetables, there are innumerable pledges to ādeepenā, āstrengthenā, āaccelerateā and āperfectā. Chinaās politicians have stuck to their habit of not being drawn on the details. And critics can point out that many vested interests prevail. Rich urbanites in Beijing and Shanghai, for example, will be spared having to share their city lifestyles with hordes of peasants, who will be able to migrate freely, but only to small cities.
The blueprint offers enough to fuel optimists. Xi Jinping has seemingly emerged from his first year with enough political capital to propose reforms his predecessors couldnāt. But thereās room for pessimists too, since the whole plan still smacks of gradualism, caution and centralised control. Marx, Leninism and Mao remain firmly entrenched in the party lexicon, which suggests reform is coming, but with Chinese characteristics. The big question is whether the contradictions that involves can hold for another decade.