Google raises temperature on “internet of things”

January 14, 2014

By Robert Cyran
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Google has turned up the temperature on the so-called “internet of things.” The search giant’s decision to pay $3.2 billion for Nest Labs, a maker of smart thermostats, signals a shift in Silicon Valley’s arc of disruption. Sending data to people on the go looks rather ho-hum next to a future where consumers communicate with, and control, their products remotely.

Huge figures have been thrown around about the size of this incipient market. Gartner claims 26 billion “things” will have an internet connection by 2020. Cisco has claimed that wiring devices represents a $19 trillion opportunity as simple gadgets, like home appliances, can be used more efficiently, tasks can be automated and entirely new markets created.

Though Cisco and Gartner have a reputation for breathless hype, there’s something to all this, as Nest demonstrates. A vending machine that tells its owners precisely what needs to be refilled, and when, means fewer service calls and more fulfilled customers. Imagine how this extra information and automation can affect the whole supply chain of the economy.

Nest Labs was just started in 2010 by two Apple guys (and funded in part by Google’s own capital). Google didn’t provide any metrics on which to judge the rationality of the price. But that’s perhaps beside the point. Nest’s hip thermostats and smoke alarms have created huge buzz and made it the poster child for those excited by this thingy internet concept. The sale of the company to Google for $3.2 billion will only feed this enthusiasm.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/