China-U.S. cyber spat risks corporate casualties

June 9, 2014

By Ethan Bilby

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

China’s security spat with the United States risks corporate casualties on both sides. The People’s Republic has responded to U.S. allegations of cyber spying by targeting American tech companies. A continuing dispute could lead to blocked deals in the United States and lost sales in China. Though companies can try to ease concerns, it’s hard for them to escape a political escalation.

U.S. companies operating in China are already suffering a backlash. The government is scrutinising the use of IBM servers by state-owned banks, while state-run media has denounced American tech groups. Though Chinese buyers may resist government pressure to switch to local suppliers, the likes of IBM and Cisco have already reported falling revenue from the mainland.

Chinese companies eager to expand overseas also have little to gain. Lenovo’s planned acquisitions of IBM’s low-end server business and the Motorola handset business both require approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). The Chinese PC and smartphone maker must convince a panel of 16 U.S. agencies it doesn’t pose a security risk. The longer the process drags on, the bigger the risk that Lenovo gets dragged into the autumn U.S. mid-term election.

Other companies have taken special steps to appease CFIUS. Alcatel of France agreed to set up a special subsidiary to handle U.S. government contracts as part of its takeover of Lucent. Japan’s SoftBank reserved a seat on the board of Sprint, its U.S. mobile phone operator, for a director to oversee national security concerns. Lenovo has won clearance from CFIUS for previous deals, including its acquisition of IBM’s PC business back in 2005. However, proposed remedies can undermine the financial logic for doing the deals.

American companies in China could try to follow Huawei’s example. The Chinese telecom equipment group has worked to ease British concerns by running a UK-based security centre to vet its products. Alternatively, companies could offer the Chinese government the opportunity to conduct regular security audits, or reserve a seat on the board of their local subsidiary for an approved Chinese citizen. However, that assumes the Chinese government is open to being persuaded at all.

Chinese companies like Huawei are already effectively shut out of the U.S. market. An escalating dispute over cyber security could deny both sides access to vital economies of scale.  That’s not in either nation’s interest.

Comments

Well if the Chinese start blocking their markets to certain companies these same companies should stop hiring in China and move to other countries instead especially America if they are in fact American companies. These companies should also put a halt on hiring Chinese nationals in other countries where they have offices.

Posted by CountryPride | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/