Holiday email embargo a must-have, not an opt-in
By George Hay
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
Daimler wants to stop email ruining the holidays of its 275,000 employees. So the German carmaker is giving them the right to have all messages received during vacation automatically re-routed, with the sender warned to try again later. In this case, choice may not be the best policy.
The objective is bang on. Checking work emails on holiday means the worker doesnât actually relax and get refreshed, and it irritates friends and family who have to share the vacation. That will ultimately hurt the company in question. Those who are able to resist the flashing light just come back to an inbox of unread messages drenched in bold type, which takes days to clean up.
Yet placing the burden for activating the policy on staff risks underestimating the latent paranoia of the average employee. Daimler insists that it wonât check who is choosing to ignore the office and who isnât. But even in a less flexible labour market like Germanyâs, workers might still fear that choosing electronic incommunicado means falling out of favour, and putting them in the firing line in the next round of redundancies.
If a company wants to really ensure its workers chill out, it would make the exercise mandatory. Sure, workaholics will carp that they canât stay in touch with vital office business, and companies would have to become more organised to ensure re-routed emails get sent to the right person. Daimlerâs policy does actually allow employees to restrict email traffic to whoever they think is most important. But a mandatory ban would make everyone relax. And if something really is that important, someone in the office can always pick up the phone and try a much underrated medium of communication â voice.