S&P 500 at 2,000 invites “new normal” thinking

August 26, 2014

By Martin Hutchinson

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Beware new paradigms. The S&P 500 Index’s first trades above 2,000 on Monday invite the idea of a new normal in markets. The price-to-earnings ratio is under 20, only moderately above average, and interest rates remain low. But U.S. earnings are at a peak relative to GDP. Assume they adjust back to the long-term norm, and the stock benchmark would be a third lower.

The average PE ratio for the S&P since its inception has been just above 15. The current valuation multiple is higher, but still well short of past peaks. That suggests there could be further to run, though a reversion to the long-term average would leave the index only slightly above 1,500, down almost a quarter from the current level.

Low interest rates also support continued share-price buoyancy. One theory known as the Fed model postulates that the earnings yield on stocks should be equal to the long-term Treasury bond yield. The model largely held during the 1990s, although it hasn’t looked particularly accurate since. The implication at today’s 2.4 percent 10-year bond rate would be for the S&P Index to trade at around 4,200.

Other measures, however, suggest the index will eventually have to come down to earth. For instance, post-tax corporate earnings in the year to March averaged 10.8 percent of GDP, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis statistics. That’s close to the all-time peak proportion reached in 2012 and far above a sixty-plus year average of 7.2 percent of GDP.

Gains from globalization and outsourcing may have boosted U.S. multinationals’ profit margins sustainably. But cheap debt also plays a part and won’t last forever. If companies’ earnings shift lower, merely to the long-term average as a percentage of GDP, then at today’s PE ratio the S&P would be around a third lower, somewhere above 1,300.

Interest rates may stay low for a while yet. And some of the margin gains at U.S. companies may be locked in, at least for a while. But mean reversion is a powerful effect. In financial markets, new paradigms usually don’t last.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/