The FIFA big boss guide to executive survival

May 28, 2015

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Soccer’s supremo Sepp Blatter may win a fifth four-year presidency at the scandal-wracked governing body after Friday’s election. Even if he fails, his tenacity is remarkable. It owes much to FIFA’s financial success. Cumbersome governance and steel-reinforced tin ears help. The circumstances provide object lessons for Machiavellian bosses everywhere.

The first rule of executive survival: be successful. If you preside over an enterprise that makes tonnes of money, including for others, you are well over half way to your goal of securing a seat at the boardroom table.

FIFA’s revenue between 2011 and 2014, its last World Cup cycle, was $5.7 billion. That’s a third up on the previous four-year cycle and more than double the sums received in 2003-2006. FIFA’s generosity to others also grew. For example, it spent more than $1 billion on football development projects between 2011 and 2014, one-third more than in the equivalent previous period.

Second rule: be accountable to a large and diverse group of stakeholders. FIFA’s Congress elects its president and each of the world’s 209 national soccer associations gets a single vote. In some respects, the structure is laudably democratic. But the size of Congress makes it hard for rebellious types to organise a putsch. The disparate nature of the FIFA electorate, and the fact that small soccer nations have power equal to large ones, comes as bonus.

Blatter’s third strength is having executive skin as thick as a corporate rhinoceros. Many bosses in Blatter’s position might have already taken responsibility for a stench such as that now surrounding soccer, on the principle that if stink arises on his or her watch, he or she should resign. Many may well think they ought to go even if, with hand on heart, they can profess ignorance.

Michel Platini, the French president of UEFA, the regional European governing body for soccer, reckons it is time for a change at the top. So does British Prime Minister David Cameron. Major sponsors including Visa are getting antsy, too. Blatter – for the time being at least – is in no mood for surrender. But while the big boss guide to executive survival has served him well so far, even he might be wondering if his defences are wearing thin.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Well, accused presumes innocent until he confesses to the crime of which he is charged.

President Obama is very African-American way to deal with any issue without any flexibility. He walks in fine line of illegal or international norm and barely acceptable argument. As far as President Obama is concerned, whether he is respected is more crucial than the real solution to the problem successfully.

If FIFA crimes are not committed in the United States and Defendants are not American citizens, then, Attorney General Lynch must proof that the authority of the U.S court can exercise long-arm jurisdiction based upon some action of the defendant which subjects him or her to the jurisdiction of the U.S court.

Posted by JenniePCChiang | Report as abusive